Revision as of 21:49, 4 October 2005 editShuricub (talk | contribs)21 editsm added spaces and punctuation← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:43, 21 October 2005 edit undoATIYAH (talk | contribs)9 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
HE MUSLIMS ARE PLANNING TO CONQUER THE WORLD IN THE NAME OF ]! WE MUST DEFEND OURSELVES; THE WAR IN IRAQ DID NOT HELP AND SADDAM WILL BE RELEASED AS PRESIDENT AGAIN. OH WOE UPON THE WORLD! REGARDS, ] 22:43, 21 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
{{Islam}} | |||
'''Islamic ]''', '''''Fiqh''''' (in ] and ]: فقه) is made up of the rulings of ]ic jurists to direct the lives of the ] faithful. There are four Sunni schools or '']'' of ''fiqh.'' | |||
The four schools of ] Islam are each named after a classical jurist. The Sunni schools (and where they are commonly found) are the ] (] and ]), ] (], ], ], ], ], ]), ] (] and ]), and ] (]). | |||
These four schools share most of their rulings, but differ on the particular ]s they accept as authentically given by ] and the weight they give to analogy or reason (]) in deciding difficulties. | |||
The ] school (], ], and parts of ]) is more associated with ]. The ]s, or time and space bound rulings of early jurists, are taken rather more seriously in this school, due to the more hierarchical structure of Shia Islam, which is ruled by the ]s. But they are also more flexible, in that every jurist has considerable power to alter a decision according to his opinion. | |||
Each school reflects a unique ] or culture, that the classical jurists themselves lived in, when rulings were made. Some suggest that the discipline of ] which developed to validate ] made it relatively easy to record and validate also the rulings of jurists, making them far easier to imitate (]) than to challenge in new contexts. The effect is, the schools have been more or less frozen for centuries, and reflect a culture that simply no longer exists. | |||
Early ] had a much more flexible character, and many modern Muslim scholars believe that it should be renewed, and that the classical jurists should lose their special status. This would require formulating a new fiqh suitable for the modern world, e.g. as proposed by advocates of the ], and would deal with the modern context. | |||
This ] is opposed by most conservative ]. | |||
== See also == | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Revision as of 22:43, 21 October 2005
HE MUSLIMS ARE PLANNING TO CONQUER THE WORLD IN THE NAME OF IBLIS! WE MUST DEFEND OURSELVES; THE WAR IN IRAQ DID NOT HELP AND SADDAM WILL BE RELEASED AS PRESIDENT AGAIN. OH WOE UPON THE WORLD! REGARDS, 22:43, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
Category: