Revision as of 00:45, 1 November 2008 editEcoleetage (talk | contribs)15,020 edits Editing articles← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:48, 1 November 2008 edit undoBoodlesthecat (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,411 edits →Editing articlesNext edit → | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Editing articles== | ==Editing articles== | ||
Misplaced Pages articles are works in progress, and any problems in regard to referencing or focus can easily be adjusted when editors work together for a common editorial goal. The subject matter of this article warrants attention, not erasure, and I can say that I am glad to see it put forth for consideration and review. In regard to the expression of concern on its contents, I would invite people to join with its original author to ensure that the article meets Misplaced Pages editorial standards. Thank you and be well. ] (]) 00:45, 1 November 2008 (UTC) | Misplaced Pages articles are works in progress, and any problems in regard to referencing or focus can easily be adjusted when editors work together for a common editorial goal. The subject matter of this article warrants attention, not erasure, and I can say that I am glad to see it put forth for consideration and review. In regard to the expression of concern on its contents, I would invite people to join with its original author to ensure that the article meets Misplaced Pages editorial standards. Thank you and be well. ] (]) 00:45, 1 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
:The issue is that the article appears to be plagiarized from a single source, and the multiple references appear to be all culled from that same source. It is merely a summary of that one single fringe source, including the viewpoint of that source.] <sup>'']''</sup> 00:48, 1 November 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:48, 1 November 2008
This entire article is culled from a single non-reliable source
Every single quote, fact, and passage in this article is culled from a single source--Wartime Rescue of Jews, edited and compiled by fringe right wing writer Mark Paul, and published by a non reliable source, the Polish Educational Foundation in North America. This article is essentially a summary of that non-reliable source, authored by a fringe author. The 40-odd references in this article are all culled from the same single Mark Paul essay, giving this Misplaced Pages article the false appearance of a well sourced encyclopedia article, rather than a summary and plagiarism of a single fringe source. It is being tagged appropriately. Boodlesthecat 23:50, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Editing articles
Misplaced Pages articles are works in progress, and any problems in regard to referencing or focus can easily be adjusted when editors work together for a common editorial goal. The subject matter of this article warrants attention, not erasure, and I can say that I am glad to see it put forth for consideration and review. In regard to the expression of concern on its contents, I would invite people to join with its original author to ensure that the article meets Misplaced Pages editorial standards. Thank you and be well. Ecoleetage (talk) 00:45, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- The issue is that the article appears to be plagiarized from a single source, and the multiple references appear to be all culled from that same source. It is merely a summary of that one single fringe source, including the viewpoint of that source.Boodlesthecat 00:48, 1 November 2008 (UTC)