| Revision as of 17:04, 25 November 2008 editGoodDamon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers6,271 edits →Please strike your accusation: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:26, 25 November 2008 edit undoShutterbug (talk | contribs)1,972 edits →Please strike your accusation: AGF has to work both waysNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| In the past, you and I had a reasonably good working relationship, so I ask again in good faith that you strike the comment you made accusing me of attacking Su-Jada. Contrary to it being an attack, it was a perfectly accurate description of an inappropriate edit and an inaccurate edit summary. Striking your accusations would go a long way towards re-establishing good faith in general. --<font color="green">]</font>] 17:04, 25 November 2008 (UTC) | In the past, you and I had a reasonably good working relationship, so I ask again in good faith that you strike the comment you made accusing me of attacking Su-Jada. Contrary to it being an attack, it was a perfectly accurate description of an inappropriate edit and an inaccurate edit summary. Striking your accusations would go a long way towards re-establishing good faith in general. --<font color="green">]</font>] 17:04, 25 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :You did attack Su-Jada and you are consistently nagging me for this and for that. This would be OK if you would currently contribute something to increase the quality of the article but you don't. What happened to you? You take what I write and complain about it, concentrating on how bad I am and so on. This is not a basis for consensus and not even a common effort, so I am actually wondering what happened to you in the past months. Did you get attacked for your neutral position on the issue? Yes, we have been working successfully together and yes I am interested in restoring this condition. It just doesn't work if we allow getting carried away in finger-pointing instead of doing research, adding sources and exchanging ideas on the grounds of Misplaced Pages policy. ] (]) 22:26, 25 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:26, 25 November 2008
| Manual Archives: 1, 2 and 3.
Automatic Archive: User talk:Shutterbug/Archive/Archive-Jan2025 |
Please strike your accusation
Hello,
In the past, you and I had a reasonably good working relationship, so I ask again in good faith that you strike the comment you made accusing me of attacking Su-Jada. Contrary to it being an attack, it was a perfectly accurate description of an inappropriate edit and an inaccurate edit summary. Striking your accusations would go a long way towards re-establishing good faith in general. --GoodDamon 17:04, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- You did attack Su-Jada and you are consistently nagging me for this and for that. This would be OK if you would currently contribute something to increase the quality of the article but you don't. What happened to you? You take what I write and complain about it, concentrating on how bad I am and so on. This is not a basis for consensus and not even a common effort, so I am actually wondering what happened to you in the past months. Did you get attacked for your neutral position on the issue? Yes, we have been working successfully together and yes I am interested in restoring this condition. It just doesn't work if we allow getting carried away in finger-pointing instead of doing research, adding sources and exchanging ideas on the grounds of Misplaced Pages policy. Shutterbug (talk) 22:26, 25 November 2008 (UTC)