Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jossi: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:04, 5 December 2008 editSteve Dufour (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers21,429 edits Re arbcom← Previous edit Revision as of 14:11, 6 December 2008 edit undoMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 14d) to User talk:Jossi/Archive 17.Next edit →
Line 28: Line 28:
As you have made comments of the discussion page of the ] article, it would be greatly appreciated if you would contribute to the debate on it's Articles for Deletion page. Thanks! As you have made comments of the discussion page of the ] article, it would be greatly appreciated if you would contribute to the debate on it's Articles for Deletion page. Thanks!
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/TomKat http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/TomKat

== Appalling suggestion ==

Hi, thanks for , however, I am appalled by one of your suggestions to block me!!


Well, I am not the angry user here and I don't need a 'cool-down' break for having reported this behavior here. If reporting such behavior would earn a block, it would only create an aversion towards the very purpose of having ]. Citing ], ''"'''Blocks intended solely to "cool down" an angry user should not be used''', as they often have the opposite effect. So I cannot be blocked 'solely' to cool me down. '''However, an angry user who is also being disruptive can be blocked to prevent further disruption'''"''.

Now I am neither angry nor disruptive, but seeking action by reporting it here. ] on the other hand is angry, disruptive, uncivil and is indulging in ]. Blocking me, just because someone thinks that I should be, for a 'cool-down' effect would work exactly in favor of ] who is stalking me to create a distaste and aversion towards Misplaced Pages. You'd succeed in helping him if you block me to 'cool' me down!!

Presenting or endorsing a case to block me, just to foster 'equality' is sheer nonsense. Please don't create an aversion towards ], otherwise no one would report anything here owing to the fear of being 'blocked' just for reporting bad behaviour, since some admin might be trying to foster 'equality'. ] (] '''·''' ]) 08:23, 21 November 2008 (UTC)


:With reference to ] is involved in every single thing that ] describes: "following another user around" accompanied by ], ], or other ]. All this has been happening for over ten days, and for over a week after I have reported it here. I have listed ALL of them there. I request you to look into this. Thanks. ] (] '''·''' ]) 08:31, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
:: I have responded at ]. Please do not cross-post. ] <small>]</small> 18:35, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi Jossi, . Is that allowed? Can I add my reply to that too? ­ <span class="sigSrkris" style="background:gold;color:#FF0000">] (])</span> 20:54, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

: I have removed his last comment. Please pursue ] as advised. ] <small>]</small> 00:31, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

::If it is closed, why is it showing up on the page still? ]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 03:27, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

== Barnstar ==

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Half Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | You haven't quite earned it yet, so this is something of an act of faith... ''''']''''' 07:06, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
|}


== ''Signpost'' updated for November 17, 2008 and before. == == ''Signpost'' updated for November 17, 2008 and before. ==
Line 182: Line 152:
Don't mean to sound snarky, but re , you are aware that you've voted support for multiple other WR posters, and that at least four of the current Arbcom are also regulars there?&nbsp;–&nbsp;'']'' 23:07, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Don't mean to sound snarky, but re , you are aware that you've voted support for multiple other WR posters, and that at least four of the current Arbcom are also regulars there?&nbsp;–&nbsp;'']'' 23:07, 2 December 2008 (UTC)


==AfD== == AfD ==

Please see: ]. ] (]) 15:04, 5 December 2008 (UTC) Please see: ]. ] (]) 15:04, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:11, 6 December 2008

Skip to table of contents
Misplaced Pages ad for Misplaced Pages:STiki
Misplaced Pages adsfile infoshow another – #237
I will respond on this page to comments, unless you ask that I respond on your talk page.
I have always been among those who believed that the greatest freedom of speech was the greatest safety, because if a man is a fool the best thing to do is to encourage him to advertise the fact by speaking.
— Woodrow Wilson

28th President of the United States

~ Post new messages to the bottom of the page ~
~ Comment about the content of a specific article on the Talk: page of that article, and not here ~
~ Do not make personal attacks or use the page for harassing me or others ~

Comments which fail to follow these requests may be immediately deleted

Please click here to leave me a new message. Tip of the day...
A self-guided tutorial

For guidance about the style and content of Misplaced Pages articles, see this tutorial. It also teaches about the Misplaced Pages community and important Misplaced Pages policies and conventions.

Prior tip – Tips library – Next tip Read more:Simplified ruleset  About Misplaced Pages   Become a Misplaced Pages tipster To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

TomKat

Hello As you have made comments of the discussion page of the TomKat article, it would be greatly appreciated if you would contribute to the debate on it's Articles for Deletion page. Thanks! http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/TomKat

Signpost updated for November 17, 2008 and before.

Because the Signpost hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into this archive. Only the three issues from November are below.

The Misplaced Pages Signpost
The Misplaced Pages Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 42 8 November 2008 About the Signpost

Template:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-s

Volume 4, Issue 43 10 November 2008 About the Signpost

Template:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-s

Volume 4, Issue 44 17 November 2008 About the Signpost

Template:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-s

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 11:10, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Previous Block Incidents

What is the reason for the blocks on 04:12, 17 November 2008, is it because of the APEX article or was it something else? --Ramu50 (talk) 23:42, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Hello Ramu50. Which block are you referring to? ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Reverting

You'll probably delete this comments, but I'll remind you too that Prem rawat topic is under probation and that reverting without explanation is unhelpful. Perhaps you should take a break from the topic. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 02:35, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

You and Momento are seemingly engaged in a disruptive editing behavior, that seems to be based on personal animosity rather than any common sense or good editorial judgment. Take a break, would you? You should consider the possibility that what you and Momento are doing there is simply stupid. No one will win, and you know that... ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 02:39, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Momento made many edits in the past two day which you left intact, while you reverted all of my edits. You are not a neutral party here. If yo uwant to play one, revert back further. Otherwize this is another example of your biased editing. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 02:45, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
No, Will. I reverted to this edit by Collect . That is 10 edits by Momento as as many of yours. I suggest again: take a break. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 02:53, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
I have self-reverted. Instead, any more of that tit-for-tat editing will surely warrant a report at WP:AE. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 03:01, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Levi's Logo

Hello, i noticed that you deleted the logo Image:Levi strauss logo.png from the Levi Strauss & Co. article, you cited in your edit summary "rv. That is the logo of a product and not of the company, and thus fails WP:FAIR" I don't want to start an edit war so lets try to settle this ASAP. Thanks Cocoaguy ここがいいcontribs Review Me! 00:02, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Please read WP:FAIR. Logos of products can be used in articles about the products themselves. The logo you uploaded is not the logo of the company and the article is about the company and not the Levi's brand. You can comment here: Misplaced Pages:Non-free_content_review#Image:Levi_strauss_logo.png ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 00:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

International reaction to the United States presidential election, 2008

Hey Jossi, last month you brought up a question at this talk page about disputed territories. Perhaps you'll take a look at how I thought to address it and offer an opinion. Thanks, Grsz 02:40, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up,Grsz11. I made an edit and explained in talk. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 03:17, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Deletion review

I have posted a question at Misplaced Pages:Deletion review#Steve_Dillard which you may be able to answer. Can you please return to that discussion to answer it? Stifle (talk) 19:39, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom candidacy

I'm sorry to spam you but I have (exceptionally) commented on your oppose. If you wish to respond, would you please do so on my election talk page. Thanks, --ROGER DAVIES  21:25, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Re arbcom

Don't mean to sound snarky, but re "WR posters do not get my vote", you are aware that you've voted support for multiple other WR posters, and that at least four of the current Arbcom are also regulars there? – iridescent 23:07, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD

Please see: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Helen Jones-Kelley. Steve Dufour (talk) 15:04, 5 December 2008 (UTC)