| Revision as of 01:11, 6 December 2008 editAuburnPilot (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users27,289 edits FYI← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:13, 6 December 2008 edit undoMisou (talk | contribs)1,668 edits →L. Ron Hubbard: yoNext edit → | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| ==]== | ==]== | ||
| FYI, you've made three reverts within the last 2 hours or so ( ). Another revert in the next 24 hours will place you in violation of the ]. Best, - ] ] 01:11, 6 December 2008 (UTC) | FYI, you've made three reverts within the last 2 hours or so ( ). Another revert in the next 24 hours will place you in violation of the ]. Best, - ] ] 01:11, 6 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :Thanks. No need to, the links is now gone (was said to be a false positive but it's not needed anyway). ] (]) 02:13, 6 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:13, 6 December 2008
 Archives |
|
|
Sorry, got no time yet to put something in here. But feel free to leave questions or comments.
| This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to User talk:Misou/Archive/Archive-Jan2025. Sections without timestamps are not archived. All archived sections are listed at the section index. |
Hi there!
Please feel free to discuss all kinds of things here, as long as the Talk page of an article is not the better choice. Misou whats up just wanted to see waht was going on!! Whats your email ? reply to jiggulad@yahoo.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.196.88.45 (talk) 22:45, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
- What's up? Misou (talk) 23:45, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Dianetics: The Original Thesis
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dianetics: The Original Thesis, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Dianetics: The Original Thesis. Cirt (talk) 13:32, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Dianetics: The Original Thesis
I have nominated Dianetics: The Original Thesis, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Dianetics: The Original Thesis. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Cirt (talk) 22:00, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Incident notice
A discussion in which you are mentioned is currently under way here. This is a courtesy notice. --GoodDamon 09:20, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- Hum? Did find nothing there. Am I late or something? Misou (talk) 22:52, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
- Yep, late. It's at WP:AE now. --GoodDamon 23:16, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
- Gosh, this sh*t again... Thanks. Misou (talk) 23:25, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
- Yep, late. It's at WP:AE now. --GoodDamon 23:16, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
L. Ron Hubbard
FYI, you've made three reverts within the last 2 hours or so ( ). Another revert in the next 24 hours will place you in violation of the three revert rule. Best, - auburnpilot talk 01:11, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. No need to, the links is now gone (was said to be a false positive but it's not needed anyway). Misou (talk) 02:13, 6 December 2008 (UTC)