| Revision as of 17:31, 26 December 2008 editSkomorokh (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers59,990 edits →Tendentious editing: reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:20, 26 December 2008 edit undoVerbal (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers21,940 edits →Tendentious editing: rNext edit → | ||
| Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
| : Stop POV pushing. Is this a ]? ] <small>]</small> 17:14, 26 December 2008 (UTC) | : Stop POV pushing. Is this a ]? ] <small>]</small> 17:14, 26 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::Excuse me? No it is not remotely a legal threat. You added {{cl|Neo-Nazi websites}} to the article ], despite the fact that nowhere in the article is there a reliable source cited for a claim that the website is ]. I thought you were an errant recent changes patroller. Please explain. <font color="404040">]</font> 17:31, 26 December 2008 (UTC) | ::Excuse me? No it is not remotely a legal threat. You added {{cl|Neo-Nazi websites}} to the article ], despite the fact that nowhere in the article is there a reliable source cited for a claim that the website is ]. I thought you were an errant recent changes patroller. Please explain. <font color="404040">]</font> 17:31, 26 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::: I don't think sources are required in the article for categories except pseudoscience ones if disputed. Slander is a legal term and should be avoided on-wiki. Sources are available - use google and the advice given to you on orange marlin's talk page. ] <small>]</small> 18:20, 26 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:20, 26 December 2008
 Archives |
|
no archives yet (create) |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
 |
|---|
| 24 December 2024 |
|
No RfXs since 17:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC).—Talk to my owner:Online |
RfA thankspam
|
|
Special thanks go out to Wizardman and Malinaccier for nominating me, and I will try to take everyone's comments on board. Thanks again for the trust the community has placed in me. A special Christmas song for you all can be found at the right hand side of this message! Apologies if you don't like RfA thankspam, this message was delivered by a bot which can't tell whether you want it or not. Feel free to remove it. Dendodge Talk, 17:40, 15 December 2008 (UTC) |
Kudos for Taking a Stand
Thanks for nixing that troll's spam before he hijacked another thread. ~Paul V. Keller 22:43, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
- I wasn't expecting to get any thanks for it! I've tagged the page and we need to make sure to keep this on topic. We should link to the recent findings against PCarbonne as a warning. Verbal chat 22:45, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Jed
I've compiled a handy list of recent contrib IPs since he refuses to register. (follows sig)LeadSongDog (talk) 18:52, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
Jed's Contribs:
Special:Contributions/68.19.97.69
Special:Contributions/68.19.98.26
Special:Contributions/68.211.45.202
Special:Contributions/68.217.47.115
Special:Contributions/68.219.54.221
Special:Contributions/68.219.153.139
Special:Contributions/68.158.255.197
Special:Contributions/208.65.88.212
Special:Contributions/208.65.88.243
Special:Contributions/208.65.89.136
Special:Contributions/208.89.102.43
Special:Contributions/208.89.102.114
Jed's talk:
User_talk:68.19.97.69
User_talk:68.19.98.26
User_talk:68.211.45.202
User_talk:68.217.47.115
User_talk:68.219.54.221
User_talk:68.219.153.139
User_talk:68.158.255.197
User_talk:208.65.88.212
User_talk:208.65.88.243
User_talk:208.65.89.136
User_talk:208.89.102.43
User_talk:208.89.102.114
Cold fusion
I've posted the topic ban notice at the top of the talk page - that should be adequate I think, but if you wanted to leave a message on the talk page, that'd be great too.--Tznkai (talk) 21:13, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Guido den Broeder
Required notice to all parties involved with the Guido den Broeder ban/block/discussion: I have appealed the ban on his behalf at WP:RFAR. Cosmic Latte (talk) 19:19, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
A.T. Still
Why do you undo the edits I made to A.T. Still's article. They changes I made were sourced with references. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dumaka (talk • contribs) 20:02, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
Tendentious editing
Please explain this edit restoring unreferenced slanderous information to a Good Article. I'm assuming it was an honest mistake and not pov-pushing, but rather than undo it I would prefer if you did so yourself. Sincerely, Skomorokh 16:59, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
- Stop POV pushing. Is this a legal threat? Verbal chat 17:14, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
- Excuse me? No it is not remotely a legal threat. You added Category:Neo-Nazi websites to the article Stormfront (website), despite the fact that nowhere in the article is there a reliable source cited for a claim that the website is Neo-Nazi. I thought you were an errant recent changes patroller. Please explain. Skomorokh 17:31, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
- I don't think sources are required in the article for categories except pseudoscience ones if disputed. Slander is a legal term and should be avoided on-wiki. Sources are available - use google and the advice given to you on orange marlin's talk page. Verbal chat 18:20, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
- Excuse me? No it is not remotely a legal threat. You added Category:Neo-Nazi websites to the article Stormfront (website), despite the fact that nowhere in the article is there a reliable source cited for a claim that the website is Neo-Nazi. I thought you were an errant recent changes patroller. Please explain. Skomorokh 17:31, 26 December 2008 (UTC)