Revision as of 17:22, 20 October 2005 editIsotope23 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,870 edits →Sources← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:44, 25 October 2005 edit undoDavidpdx (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,793 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*State v Riogi FJHC 81 | *State v Riogi FJHC 81 | ||
*Copy of the documents purporting a lease on Solkope | *Copy of the documents purporting a lease on Solkope | ||
= Solkope - | |||
I respect your effort to try to rewrite this article. However, I feel very strongly that the more he (and we both know who I'm talking about) is permitted to spread this crap throughout Misplaced Pages, the more legitimate it will make it. It defintately is not legitimate. | |||
I did look at the links, I feel the document from University of Hawaii is not a legal document. What it appears to be is the text of a legal document with no signtures or seals. I honestly feel that could have been typed by anyone. | |||
I'll put these comments on the talk page as you are requesting, however likely it will just start a larger fight between myself and Johnski (aka Samuelspade/KAJ/ect). I don't know if you are aware, but he has several sockpuppets and has been up to some pretty dishonest stuff on Misplaced Pages. Please feel free to look at the history on the DOM page at some of the stuff that has been happening. | |||
What it comes down to, is that I'm not willing to work with him because of his actions. I'm sure at some point you've been burned by someone and once you are, it's impossible to work with them anymore. ] 01:44, 25 October 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:44, 25 October 2005
Dispute
Give me a bit of time to find the source for the Solkope land dispute. If anyone is truly concerned about the factuality of this claim I will pull the whole reference to DOM and just leave a location stub in the interim.--Isotope23 13:46, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
- I can't find the website I found the dispute information on, so in the interest of fairness, I've removed that portion for the time being. Hopefully I'll have more time to find it later. I did tweak the wording because the legality of the lease documents and the ownership of the island by Hiagi Apao are purported by DoM, but have never been conclusively proven. The documents were used as evidence in a crimal case (State v Riogi FJHC 81), but no ruling was made on the legality of the documents (they were presented as evidence of seditious intent by the defendant and the legal claims of ownership were in no way considered in this case). I write this because I'm already seeing the potential for a POV edit war where anon IP's try to introduce POV text into this article. If this starts turning into an edit war I will request an edit lock on this article.--Isotope23 14:08, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
Sources
In case anyone cares...
= Solkope -
I respect your effort to try to rewrite this article. However, I feel very strongly that the more he (and we both know who I'm talking about) is permitted to spread this crap throughout Misplaced Pages, the more legitimate it will make it. It defintately is not legitimate.
I did look at the links, I feel the document from University of Hawaii is not a legal document. What it appears to be is the text of a legal document with no signtures or seals. I honestly feel that could have been typed by anyone.
I'll put these comments on the talk page as you are requesting, however likely it will just start a larger fight between myself and Johnski (aka Samuelspade/KAJ/ect). I don't know if you are aware, but he has several sockpuppets and has been up to some pretty dishonest stuff on Misplaced Pages. Please feel free to look at the history on the DOM page at some of the stuff that has been happening.
What it comes down to, is that I'm not willing to work with him because of his actions. I'm sure at some point you've been burned by someone and once you are, it's impossible to work with them anymore. Davidpdx 01:44, 25 October 2005 (UTC)