| Revision as of 22:43, 21 October 2005 editATIYAH (talk | contribs)9 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:43, 21 October 2005 edit undoSasquatch (talk | contribs)Administrators10,702 editsm Reverted edits by ATIYAH to last version by ShuricubNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Islam}} | |||
| HE MUSLIMS ARE PLANNING TO CONQUER THE WORLD IN THE NAME OF ]! WE MUST DEFEND OURSELVES; THE WAR IN IRAQ DID NOT HELP AND SADDAM WILL BE RELEASED AS PRESIDENT AGAIN. OH WOE UPON THE WORLD! REGARDS, ] 22:43, 21 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| '''Islamic ]''', '''''Fiqh''''' (in ] and ]: فقه) is made up of the rulings of ]ic jurists to direct the lives of the ] faithful. There are four Sunni schools or '']'' of ''fiqh.'' | |||
| The four schools of ] Islam are each named after a classical jurist. The Sunni schools (and where they are commonly found) are the ] (] and ]), ] (], ], ], ], ], ]), ] (] and ]), and ] (]). | |||
| These four schools share most of their rulings, but differ on the particular ]s they accept as authentically given by ] and the weight they give to analogy or reason (]) in deciding difficulties. | |||
| The ] school (], ], and parts of ]) is more associated with ]. The ]s, or time and space bound rulings of early jurists, are taken rather more seriously in this school, due to the more hierarchical structure of Shia Islam, which is ruled by the ]s. But they are also more flexible, in that every jurist has considerable power to alter a decision according to his opinion. | |||
| Each school reflects a unique ] or culture, that the classical jurists themselves lived in, when rulings were made. Some suggest that the discipline of ] which developed to validate ] made it relatively easy to record and validate also the rulings of jurists, making them far easier to imitate (]) than to challenge in new contexts. The effect is, the schools have been more or less frozen for centuries, and reflect a culture that simply no longer exists. | |||
| Early ] had a much more flexible character, and many modern Muslim scholars believe that it should be renewed, and that the classical jurists should lose their special status. This would require formulating a new fiqh suitable for the modern world, e.g. as proposed by advocates of the ], and would deal with the modern context. | |||
| This ] is opposed by most conservative ]. | |||
| == See also == | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
Revision as of 22:43, 21 October 2005
| Part of a series on |
| Islam |
|---|
 |
| Beliefs |
| Practices |
| History |
| Culture and society |
| Related topics |
Islamic jurisprudence, Fiqh (in Arabic and Persian: فقه) is made up of the rulings of Islamic jurists to direct the lives of the Muslim faithful. There are four Sunni schools or maddhab of fiqh.
The four schools of Sunni Islam are each named after a classical jurist. The Sunni schools (and where they are commonly found) are the Shafi'i (Indonesia and Malaysia), Hanafi (Turkey, the Balkans, Central Asia, Indian subcontinent, Egypt, China), Maliki (North Africa and West Africa), and Hanbali (Arabia).
These four schools share most of their rulings, but differ on the particular hadiths they accept as authentically given by Muhammad and the weight they give to analogy or reason (qiyas) in deciding difficulties.
The Jaferi school (Iran, Iraq, and parts of Afghanistan) is more associated with Shia Islam. The fatwas, or time and space bound rulings of early jurists, are taken rather more seriously in this school, due to the more hierarchical structure of Shia Islam, which is ruled by the imams. But they are also more flexible, in that every jurist has considerable power to alter a decision according to his opinion.
Each school reflects a unique al-urf or culture, that the classical jurists themselves lived in, when rulings were made. Some suggest that the discipline of isnah which developed to validate hadith made it relatively easy to record and validate also the rulings of jurists, making them far easier to imitate (taqlid) than to challenge in new contexts. The effect is, the schools have been more or less frozen for centuries, and reflect a culture that simply no longer exists.
Early shariah had a much more flexible character, and many modern Muslim scholars believe that it should be renewed, and that the classical jurists should lose their special status. This would require formulating a new fiqh suitable for the modern world, e.g. as proposed by advocates of the Islamization of knowledge, and would deal with the modern context.
This modernization is opposed by most conservative ulema.