Misplaced Pages

User talk:Nizevyn: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:58, 3 January 2009 editSmashville (talk | contribs)10,619 edits Edit to my userpage: declined← Previous edit Revision as of 04:29, 3 January 2009 edit undoNizevyn (talk | contribs)9 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:


{{unblock reviewed|1=I didn't realize that trying to ask someone for citations as to when they actually played Threshold RPG was actually a ban-able offense around here. Mendaliv seems to be allowed carte-blanche when it comes to editing Threshold's wikipage and asking for citations on the most mundane things, like the average number of users logged in, or the names of some prominent clans(despite 3-5 active clans currently being listed. As for being a "sockpuppet" of Cambios, I don't know who that is. I could probably take a guess as to whom, but I really don't care at the moment.|decline=You were blocked for sockpuppetry, not asking for citations. You have provided no reason for an unblock. — ]] 02:58, 3 January 2009 (UTC)}} {{unblock reviewed|1=I didn't realize that trying to ask someone for citations as to when they actually played Threshold RPG was actually a ban-able offense around here. Mendaliv seems to be allowed carte-blanche when it comes to editing Threshold's wikipage and asking for citations on the most mundane things, like the average number of users logged in, or the names of some prominent clans(despite 3-5 active clans currently being listed. As for being a "sockpuppet" of Cambios, I don't know who that is. I could probably take a guess as to whom, but I really don't care at the moment.|decline=You were blocked for sockpuppetry, not asking for citations. You have provided no reason for an unblock. — ]] 02:58, 3 January 2009 (UTC)}}

{{unblock|I'm requesting an IP Check of Cambios and myself(Nizevyn), to show that I am not a "sockpuppet".}} ] (]) 04:29, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:29, 3 January 2009

Edit to my userpage

Hi there, I noticed that you made an edit to my userpage at User:Mendaliv, but it didn't have any content. If you had a message for me, please leave it at User talk:Mendaliv instead. That way I'll be notified of your message. Thanks! —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 18:40, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for block evasion and/or meatpuppetry. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Black Kite 19:12, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nizevyn (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I didn't realize that trying to ask someone for citations as to when they actually played Threshold RPG was actually a ban-able offense around here. Mendaliv seems to be allowed carte-blanche when it comes to editing Threshold's wikipage and asking for citations on the most mundane things, like the average number of users logged in, or the names of some prominent clans(despite 3-5 active clans currently being listed. As for being a "sockpuppet" of Cambios, I don't know who that is. I could probably take a guess as to whom, but I really don't care at the moment.

Decline reason:

You were blocked for sockpuppetry, not asking for citations. You have provided no reason for an unblock. — Smashville 02:58, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Nizevyn (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm requesting an IP Check of Cambios and myself(Nizevyn), to show that I am not a "sockpuppet".

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I'm requesting an IP Check of Cambios and myself(Nizevyn), to show that I am not a "sockpuppet". |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I'm requesting an IP Check of Cambios and myself(Nizevyn), to show that I am not a "sockpuppet". |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I'm requesting an IP Check of Cambios and myself(Nizevyn), to show that I am not a "sockpuppet". |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Nizevyn (talk) 04:29, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Categories: