| Revision as of 04:23, 6 January 2009 editElonka (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators70,960 edits request← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:34, 6 January 2009 edit undoDematt (talk | contribs)5,093 edits →Request: miss you guysNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| ==Request== | ==Request== | ||
| Hiya, at the pseudosciences list, I realize that it's a hot topic, but unless there's a strong consensus to do so on the talkpage, it's probably not a good idea to be removing sourced information like this. You may wish to ''modify'' the information, but the citations themselves should probably be left in place. Thanks, --]]] 04:23, 6 January 2009 (UTC) | Hiya, at the pseudosciences list, I realize that it's a hot topic, but unless there's a strong consensus to do so on the talkpage, it's probably not a good idea to be removing sourced information like this. You may wish to ''modify'' the information, but the citations themselves should probably be left in place. Thanks, --]]] 04:23, 6 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| Hi Elonka, good to see you're still here. I respect what you are trying to do. Sorry to get involved, I'll leave it up to you. -- <b><font color="999900">]</font></b> <font color="#009900" size="1">]</font> 04:34, 6 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:34, 6 January 2009
|
| 4/20 - 9/21 2006 |
| 2 |
Invitation to CfD Category:Pseudoskeptic Target Discussion
I noticed that you have edited in related areas within WP, and so thought you might have an interest in this discussion.-- self-ref (nagasiva yronwode) (talk) 18:56, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Treatment techniques
The Talk:Chiropractic#Treatment techniques section needs an expert on the subject. I hope you are interested in helping out in reaching WP:GA status for chiropractic. This is possible with the help of an expert. QuackGuru (talk) 23:48, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Request
Hiya, at the pseudosciences list, I realize that it's a hot topic, but unless there's a strong consensus to do so on the talkpage, it's probably not a good idea to be removing sourced information like this. You may wish to modify the information, but the citations themselves should probably be left in place. Thanks, --Elonka 04:23, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi Elonka, good to see you're still here. I respect what you are trying to do. Sorry to get involved, I'll leave it up to you. -- Dēmatt (chat) 04:34, 6 January 2009 (UTC)