Revision as of 16:47, 29 October 2005 editJosh Grosse (talk | contribs)8,857 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:58, 2 November 2005 edit undoHesperian (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users135,225 edits Suggested parametersNext edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
==Suggested parameters== | |||
Great work bringing on the new template!... but there are still a couple of parameters missing. | |||
Firstly, I need to be able to specify taxa at "Section" and "Series" rank. See ] for evidence of a number of non-existent species articles, for which these ranks will be needed when I get around to writing them. | |||
Secondly, the "Diversity" option was very useful. I used it at '']'' to state the number of species, since the subdivision was at subgenus rank. It is also very useful for higher taxa such as families and orders. | |||
Thirdly, the "Synonyms" option was also useful, and should be included here. | |||
] | ] 23:58, 2 November 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:58, 2 November 2005
About this template
The implementation of this template is scarier than its usage. For one example of how to use it see the the edit page of Orca - http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Orca&action=edit. Most parameters are optional, so if a particular entry is not relevant for your case, just leave it out. See the taxobox usage for an explanation.
Suggested parameters
Great work bringing on the new template!... but there are still a couple of parameters missing.
Firstly, I need to be able to specify taxa at "Section" and "Series" rank. See Taxonomy of Banksia for evidence of a number of non-existent species articles, for which these ranks will be needed when I get around to writing them.
Secondly, the "Diversity" option was very useful. I used it at Banksia to state the number of species, since the subdivision was at subgenus rank. It is also very useful for higher taxa such as families and orders.
Thirdly, the "Synonyms" option was also useful, and should be included here.