Revision as of 20:11, 2 February 2009 view sourceGoRight (talk | contribs)6,435 edits →Revert warring: - As long as you are going to keep this log, I might as well keep my notes here too.← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:13, 2 February 2009 view source GoRight (talk | contribs)6,435 edits →WikilawyeringNext edit → | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
* Arguing about whether or not his reverts were actually reverts - | * Arguing about whether or not his reverts were actually reverts - | ||
* Arguing against a properly applied community ban on Rothwell ("My thought is that you're wikilawyering excessively." - ) | * Arguing against a properly applied community ban on Rothwell ("My thought is that you're wikilawyering excessively." - ) | ||
:: Requesting clarification on a block related to an RfA in which the committee explicitly did NOT endorse a community ban on Rothwell. --] (]) 20:13, 2 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
==Revert warring== | ==Revert warring== |
Revision as of 20:13, 2 February 2009
Evidence pertaining to GoRight's behavior since his RFC and institution of the community ban, for possible use in an RFC or Arbitration case pertaining to GoRight's disruptive conduct.
Hitlists
Fomenting edit wars
- (James Hansen, August 19)
- {{fact}} bombing the Global warming FAQ - (including one for a statement that greenland is covered in ice)
- Using false BLP claims to whitewash Robert M. Carter
- The Deniers, Jaunary 9,
Original research
- Attempting to remove a statement sourced to a peer reviewed pub-med journal based on his own original research -
Canvassing
Wikilawyering
- Arguing about the procedures for imposing the community ban -
- Arguing about the scope of his ban -
- Arguing about whether or not his reverts were actually reverts -
- Arguing against a properly applied community ban on Rothwell ("My thought is that you're wikilawyering excessively." - Jehochman)
Revert warring
During the ANI community ban discussion, GoRight claimed he would in the future adhere to a 1rr. This was a lie designed to make people more sympathetic to him and less likely to support the community ban:
- James Hansen, August 19, 1 2
- The Deniers, January 9, 1 2
- Reverting warring to include a misquotation (which was originally added by a Scibaby sock) on the James Hansen article
Misinterpreting Misplaced Pages policy
- Claims that using other sources to support Hansen's claim of energy industry funding deniers is original research
- Claims that his reverts weren't actually reverts according to 0rr -
- Using false BLP claims to whitewash Robert M. Carter
- Support's Abd's claims that Jzg's administration actions on the cold fusion articles were inappropriate. The arbitration commity later found this accusations meritless and Jzg's actions fully supported by policy.
Political back-scratching
- After Abd makes comments supportive of GoRight on the RFC and ANI discussion, GoRight shows up on a discussion he has never show any interest in to support Abd's advocacy . Then, after Abd is banned, GoRight lobbies to get Abd unbanned
- Support's Abd's claims that Jzg's administration actions on the cold fusion articles were inappropriate. The arbitration commity later found this accusations meritless and Jzg's actions fully supported by policy.
Using talk pages as soap-boxes
NPOV violations
BLP violations
- Adds Fred Singer's CV as a source to his biography (while hypocritically claiming that Real Climate is not a reliable source, despite discussion on BLPN that found otherwise.)
- Reverting warring to include a misquotation (which was originally added by a Scibaby sock) on the James Hansen article
Sockpuppetry?
- user:LFOD - sockpuppet pops up in the middle of GoRight's ANI discussion to defend him (sockmaster unknown)
Miscellaneous dickery
- Rewriting the history of his own misbehavior - Months after the RFC is closed, GoRight adds a "closing statement" at the top falsely claiming that the community sanction did not originate from the RFC.