Misplaced Pages

Talk:Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea case: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:28, 5 February 2009 editAndriyK (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers3,870 edits Created page with '==80% of area does not mean 80% of oil and gas reserves == Indeed, EUobserver states that ''The verdict - which cannot be appealed - means Romania can exploit 80 p...'  Revision as of 17:36, 5 February 2009 edit undoYulia Romero (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers68,701 edits True!Next edit →
Line 4: Line 4:
But it would be correct if the reserves are evenly distributed over the area. There is no evidence that this is the case. But it would be correct if the reserves are evenly distributed over the area. There is no evidence that this is the case.
If a journalist from EUobserver made a mistake or unjustified assertion, it is not a reason to repeat it here. We have to use common sence while editing articles.--] (]) 15:28, 5 February 2009 (UTC) If a journalist from EUobserver made a mistake or unjustified assertion, it is not a reason to repeat it here. We have to use common sence while editing articles.--] (]) 15:28, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
:True, it is very whisfull thinking and a Ukrainian official says something completely different... until it is investigated 100% nobody can be sure about this sort of things... — ] (]) 17:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:36, 5 February 2009

80% of area does not mean 80% of oil and gas reserves

Indeed, EUobserver states that The verdict - which cannot be appealed - means Romania can exploit 80 percent of the 100 billion cubic metres of gas and 15 million tonnes of crude oil in the disputed zone, leaving the rest to Ukraine. But it would be correct if the reserves are evenly distributed over the area. There is no evidence that this is the case. If a journalist from EUobserver made a mistake or unjustified assertion, it is not a reason to repeat it here. We have to use common sence while editing articles.--AndriyK (talk) 15:28, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

True, it is very whisfull thinking and a Ukrainian official says something completely different... until it is investigated 100% nobody can be sure about this sort of things... — Mariah-Yulia (talk) 17:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)