| Revision as of 15:48, 5 February 2009 view sourceMercenary Roadie (talk | contribs)261 edits The Riftwar Cycle Page← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:10, 5 February 2009 view source Kylu (talk | contribs)9,405 edits →The Riftware Cycle page: + link to replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| ] (]) 15:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC) | ] (]) 15:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
| : ] (]) 20:10, 5 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:10, 5 February 2009
Old archives • Current archive • If you're requesting a database query, please consider supplying the query. Thanks.I will discuss disputes if I am directly involved, but I will not resolve your disputes for you. We have a process for that. :-)
Thanks for taking care of that so quick!
Appreciated, Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 06:24, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- De nada. Kylu (talk) 07:21, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Your election page
See Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight elections/February 2009 — Rlevse • Talk • 01:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
The Riftware Cycle page
Thank you for correcting my mistake on that page. Would you agree that a redirect to the authors page would be a better redirect than the redirect to just the page about the first series in the complete saga?
It appears from the discussion on the authors page that an article on The Riftwar Cycle is in the works, but not yet published. So just asking for that page to be deleted might not be a good idea.
Thoughts and opinions appreciated.