Misplaced Pages

Talk:Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea case: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:36, 5 February 2009 editYulia Romero (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers68,701 edits True!← Previous edit Revision as of 16:59, 24 August 2009 edit undoNergaal (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers48,094 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WPRO}}
==80% of area does not mean 80% of oil and gas reserves == ==80% of area does not mean 80% of oil and gas reserves ==
Indeed, EUobserver states that Indeed, EUobserver states that

Revision as of 16:59, 24 August 2009

WikiProject iconRomania Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
To-do list:

 Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

80% of area does not mean 80% of oil and gas reserves

Indeed, EUobserver states that The verdict - which cannot be appealed - means Romania can exploit 80 percent of the 100 billion cubic metres of gas and 15 million tonnes of crude oil in the disputed zone, leaving the rest to Ukraine. But it would be correct if the reserves are evenly distributed over the area. There is no evidence that this is the case. If a journalist from EUobserver made a mistake or unjustified assertion, it is not a reason to repeat it here. We have to use common sence while editing articles.--AndriyK (talk) 15:28, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

True, it is very whisfull thinking and a Ukrainian official says something completely different... until it is investigated 100% nobody can be sure about this sort of things... — Mariah-Yulia (talk) 17:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Categories: