| Revision as of 12:24, 14 February 2009 editOhconfucius (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers328,947 edits →Extra! Extra! Read all bout it!← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:44, 14 February 2009 edit undoOhconfucius (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers328,947 edits →Extra! Extra! Read all bout it!Next edit → | ||
| Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
| ==Extra! Extra! Read all bout it!== | ==Extra! Extra! Read all bout it!== | ||
| . ] (]) 12:24, 14 February 2009 (UTC) | . Oh, I agree with your comments on his talk page about his spelling. Just as well this is a wiki, where someone else will always be there to correct those mistakes. ] (]) 12:24, 14 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:44, 14 February 2009
 | This editor is not an administrator and does not wish to be one. |
 |
|---|
| 24 December 2024 |
|
Real-life workload: 9.5
- 1 = no work pressure
- 5 = middling
- > 5 = please don't expect much
- 10 = frenzied
Please note that I don't normally (1) copy-edit articles, or (2) review articles that are not candidates for promotion to featured status.
| FACs and FARCs urgently requiring review | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/SS Kroonland
Hi Tony,
Hope things are all right in real life, and that you are not affected by the horrible wildfires. Just pinging you about Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/SS Kroonland, where you commented on the prose. Maralia has completed a copyedit of the article; please revisit when you get a chance.
Thanks, BuddingJournalist 18:50, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Proposed at ArbCom
(Perma-link)
Greg L (talk) 04:31, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- By the way, I enabled my email. I am generally paranoid about giving out any kind of personal information over the Internet. I solved this problem by creating a dedicated wikipedia email. Dabomb87 (talk) 13:40, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Overlinking
Hi Tony. Thanks for your feedback. Please feel free to delink. I'm just trying to work very quickly through the wikification backlog so am likely to make some errors. Itsmejudith (talk) 10:03, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
9.5
Wow, sorry to hear about that. Looking forward to your return after you get out from under it all. Finell (Talk) 03:40, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. It's hard—millions of dollars at stake, and much pressure from a lot of people. Tony (talk) 06:56, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
A counter-proposal
It may interesting to see what the other side has to say about date linking. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:28, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- I can't see how that won't end up like a dog's breakfast (the invitation to add suggestions). Tony (talk) 12:04, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- or a camel (a horse built by a committee), just like their RfC. It'll collect hundreds of kB of examples/wishlists of exceptions, just like the RfC was beginning to do before it closed. Ohconfucius (talk) 12:17, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Extra! Extra! Read all bout it!
Even Rubin and Cole say Tennis expert has lost it. Oh, I agree with your comments on his talk page about his spelling. Just as well this is a wiki, where someone else will always be there to correct those mistakes. Ohconfucius (talk) 12:24, 14 February 2009 (UTC)