Revision as of 13:41, 24 February 2009 editOhconfucius (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers328,947 edits →Civility: +smac← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:51, 24 February 2009 edit undoOhconfucius (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers328,947 edits →Greg L's fanboysNext edit → | ||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
I wouldn't even bother replying to these desperate wikilawyers, if I were you. It's really not worth the effort, and they'll just use it as an extension of the they've already created out of the date delinking issue. (If you don't know what ''that'' is, my advice is don't even ask, for your sanity and stress level's sake.) Cheers, -- ] ]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>] 03:01, 24 February 2009 (UTC) | I wouldn't even bother replying to these desperate wikilawyers, if I were you. It's really not worth the effort, and they'll just use it as an extension of the they've already created out of the date delinking issue. (If you don't know what ''that'' is, my advice is don't even ask, for your sanity and stress level's sake.) Cheers, -- ] ]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>] 03:01, 24 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
*Oh, ''quelle surprise'' to find you here. In need of friends perhaps? ] (]) 13:51, 24 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
== i got your comment == | == i got your comment == |
Revision as of 13:51, 24 February 2009
PDT)Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an anonymous editor, I will reply here.
|
Archives | ||||||||
|
||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Talkback
Hello, Daedalus969. You have new messages at Livitup's talk page.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
tb
Hello, Daedalus969. You have new messages at roux's talk page. |
You can remove this notice at any time by removing this template. |
Thanks for dealing with the vandalism at Troy Davis case
Just wanted to say thanks. Have a great Christmas. Josh Atkins has smiled at you!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Smile!
A Nobody has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
ANI notice
Stop acting childish. Those talk page rules ain't bothering you. Tarysky (talk) 02:30, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- I also warned him on his talk page, and he responded by referring to my good faith warnings as "personal attacks." Dayewalker (talk) 05:32, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- One sees this more and more these days, mild policy warnings from editors answered back with claims of "personal attacks," "abuse," "harassment" and so on. Gwen Gale (talk) 09:57, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
RE: Feeding trolls
In response to : Misplaced Pages:Deny_recognition. Your edit was probably not all that helpful... -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 06:39, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages Signpost — February 23, 2009
This week, the Misplaced Pages Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:
- Philosophers analyze Misplaced Pages as a knowledge source
- An automated article monitoring system for WikiProjects
- News and notes: Wikimania, usability, picture contest, milestones
- Misplaced Pages in the news: Lessons for Brits, patent citations
- Dispatches: Hundredth Featured sound approaches
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Islam
- Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 01:20, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Greg L's fanboys
I wouldn't even bother replying to these desperate wikilawyers, if I were you. It's really not worth the effort, and they'll just use it as an extension of the forest fire they've already created out of the date delinking issue. (If you don't know what that is, my advice is don't even ask, for your sanity and stress level's sake.) Cheers, -- Earle Martin 03:01, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, quelle surprise to find you here. In need of friends perhaps? Ohconfucius (talk) 13:51, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
i got your comment
dude relax don't call me a snot nosed brat because i made a vandalism that consisted of two letters and which cpould be reverted so easily I Am The Hollaback Boy (talk) 07:14, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
what are you talking about? how did i betray you from what i remember you never had faith in me in fact you tried to get me reblockedI Am The Hollaback Boy (talk) 07:27, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
you were never nice to me ever you are partly the reason i turnedI Am The Hollaback Boy (talk) 07:31, 24 February 2009 (UTC) lol calm downI Am The Hollaback Boy (talk) 07:37, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Civility
Edits like this and this are probably a bit much. This is at least the second time you've been warned for incivility or related misconduct recently. You've got to calm down. Chicken Wing (talk) 07:36, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- You need to review all the material before you go commenting. Back off. You obviously don't like me, in fact, you see me as an idiot, so unless you can learn to stop judging people, I am going to have no further comments with you.— Dædαlus 07:44, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- I've read it all. I'm actually trying to do you a really big favor. I don't need to say anything to the other editor because there is no redeeming content in his/her edits. I'm going to put it to you straight -- people are playing you for a fool right now. I'm just being honest. The longer you engage these vandals, the longer they are going to antagonize you. Do you ever notice that there seems to be more trouble around you than most other editors? It's because you feed the trolls. I'm not trying to get you blocked. I'm not trying to get you upset. I'm trying to make the vandals leave, and I'm trying to keep you from stepping over the line. I really am. You may not like the messenger, but the message itself is something you should take seriously. Chicken Wing (talk) 08:01, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Why do you care what happens to me.— Dædαlus 08:11, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Despite what you may think, I don't hate you. Again, I'm going to ignore the rules and just be honest with you. I think there is a part of you that wants to fight vandalism, but there is perhaps also a part of you that enjoys the attention from feeding the trolls. I could be wrong; I'm just thinking out loud. I have no desire to see you get blocked, and I have no desire to see you antagonized by vandals more than you can tolerate. Just my opinion, but I think you should step away from policy issues and from fighting vandalism. Find a couple of projects and work on improving articles. Add to the intellectual substance of Misplaced Pages. When you do stumble into vandals, revert their edits and ignore them. Do not engage them. You don't have to reform them, reason with them, or reveal to them your emotions. I really am trying to do you a favor here. Again, I could be wrong, but I do think I'm saying something to you that perhaps some of your friends on Misplaced Pages should have said to you earlier or have wanted to say but were unwilling to say it. Chicken Wing (talk) 08:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- You're half right. It isn't that I enjoy the attention from them, it's that I enjoy the chase. I like doing research, searching for diffs, and typing out some amount of.. basically a report on what I found. I like figuring out the modus operandi of the current vandal(re: sockpuppet, or such) I'm chasing. To put it simply, I like the detective-like work.— Dædαlus 08:32, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, but keep in mind that a real detective would lose his license if, while catching the criminal, he allowed a lot of collateral damage. Track the vandals down and report them, but don't get sucked into their mind games. If you're responding to third parties with mild profanities, or if you're responding to vandals with anything other than templates, then you're probably creating collateral damage. By engaging them, they stick around and cause more trouble for everyone else. Chicken Wing (talk) 08:46, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Alright, thank you for the tips.— Dædαlus 08:46, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, but keep in mind that a real detective would lose his license if, while catching the criminal, he allowed a lot of collateral damage. Track the vandals down and report them, but don't get sucked into their mind games. If you're responding to third parties with mild profanities, or if you're responding to vandals with anything other than templates, then you're probably creating collateral damage. By engaging them, they stick around and cause more trouble for everyone else. Chicken Wing (talk) 08:46, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- You're half right. It isn't that I enjoy the attention from them, it's that I enjoy the chase. I like doing research, searching for diffs, and typing out some amount of.. basically a report on what I found. I like figuring out the modus operandi of the current vandal(re: sockpuppet, or such) I'm chasing. To put it simply, I like the detective-like work.— Dædαlus 08:32, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Despite what you may think, I don't hate you. Again, I'm going to ignore the rules and just be honest with you. I think there is a part of you that wants to fight vandalism, but there is perhaps also a part of you that enjoys the attention from feeding the trolls. I could be wrong; I'm just thinking out loud. I have no desire to see you get blocked, and I have no desire to see you antagonized by vandals more than you can tolerate. Just my opinion, but I think you should step away from policy issues and from fighting vandalism. Find a couple of projects and work on improving articles. Add to the intellectual substance of Misplaced Pages. When you do stumble into vandals, revert their edits and ignore them. Do not engage them. You don't have to reform them, reason with them, or reveal to them your emotions. I really am trying to do you a favor here. Again, I could be wrong, but I do think I'm saying something to you that perhaps some of your friends on Misplaced Pages should have said to you earlier or have wanted to say but were unwilling to say it. Chicken Wing (talk) 08:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Why do you care what happens to me.— Dædαlus 08:11, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- I've read it all. I'm actually trying to do you a really big favor. I don't need to say anything to the other editor because there is no redeeming content in his/her edits. I'm going to put it to you straight -- people are playing you for a fool right now. I'm just being honest. The longer you engage these vandals, the longer they are going to antagonize you. Do you ever notice that there seems to be more trouble around you than most other editors? It's because you feed the trolls. I'm not trying to get you blocked. I'm not trying to get you upset. I'm trying to make the vandals leave, and I'm trying to keep you from stepping over the line. I really am. You may not like the messenger, but the message itself is something you should take seriously. Chicken Wing (talk) 08:01, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Please note that there is an alert in your name at WP"WQA. Osomething ;-) (talk) 13:20, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
jeez
hey don't stop believing in the human race because of me i was always a vandal don't take it so personally remember wp civilityI Am The Hollaback Boy (talk) 07:42, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Help
Don't let 'em get to you, Daedalus. When you've got someone riding you like that who's not supposed to be here, just ignore them. Revert and ignore, and find an admin. There's nothing to be gained from wasting words on someone who's only here to get your goat. They're not worth it. Dayewalker (talk) 07:54, 24 February 2009 (UTC)