| Revision as of 22:27, 8 November 2005 editDanteferno (talk | contribs)2,428 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:13, 9 November 2005 edit undoIdont Havaname (talk | contribs)8,502 edits Evanescence piracyNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| I have already "constructively critiqued" your rendition on the discussion page, and while it may not have been the "constructive critiques" you liked, I feel the positions were made pretty clear. Doing so again would be repeating myself, just as I have asked you a number of times to provide published documentation that backs up your claims and refutes material in the original edit. At this point, I suggest you ask ] and/or ] for feedback - they both reverted your edits back to the original more than once, and chances are, there were reasons behind it - perhaps some that were different than mine. Thank you. ] 18:08 08 November 2005 (UTC) | I have already "constructively critiqued" your rendition on the discussion page, and while it may not have been the "constructive critiques" you liked, I feel the positions were made pretty clear. Doing so again would be repeating myself, just as I have asked you a number of times to provide published documentation that backs up your claims and refutes material in the original edit. At this point, I suggest you ask ] and/or ] for feedback - they both reverted your edits back to the original more than once, and chances are, there were reasons behind it - perhaps some that were different than mine. Thank you. ] 18:08 08 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
| == ] piracy == | |||
| I've asked about this at ]. You should probably keep that page on your watchlist in case they have anything to say about it (I'm sure somebody there will say something within the next several days). --] 15:13, 9 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:13, 9 November 2005
Re: Gothic Metal Revision
I have already "constructively critiqued" your rendition on the discussion page, and while it may not have been the "constructive critiques" you liked, I feel the positions were made pretty clear. Doing so again would be repeating myself, just as I have asked you a number of times to provide published documentation that backs up your claims and refutes material in the original edit. At this point, I suggest you ask Idont Havaname and/or Ray Dassen for feedback - they both reverted your edits back to the original more than once, and chances are, there were reasons behind it - perhaps some that were different than mine. Thank you. Danteferno 18:08 08 November 2005 (UTC)
Evanescence piracy
I've asked about this at Talk:Evanescence. You should probably keep that page on your watchlist in case they have anything to say about it (I'm sure somebody there will say something within the next several days). --Idont Havaname 15:13, 9 November 2005 (UTC)