| Revision as of 03:24, 17 March 2009 editRenamed user Sloane (talk | contribs)7,015 edits archiving this retarded discussion← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:26, 17 March 2009 edit undoKs64q2 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,047 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{archive box|], ]}} | {{archive box|], ]}} | ||
| ==New discussions go at the bottom== | ==New discussions go at the bottom== | ||
| == The Motley Moose == | |||
| *phew*. Okay, took a breather, and apologize for things getting so heated. Do what you will with the Speedy Delete, I'm confident it will be removed and the AfD will continue as if it hadn't appeared. I understand your concerns with placing it, you're acting in good faith, but certainly you can see why that would be somewhat questionable, given the depth of the current AfD. Also, I would truly like to understand why ] is considered unreliable as a source, and what other specific examples you have on problems with ] article, especially considering ]. Thanks. I do appreciate your input. ] (]) 03:26, 17 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:26, 17 March 2009
 Archives |
New discussions go at the bottom
The Motley Moose
- phew*. Okay, took a breather, and apologize for things getting so heated. Do what you will with the Speedy Delete, I'm confident it will be removed and the AfD will continue as if it hadn't appeared. I understand your concerns with placing it, you're acting in good faith, but certainly you can see why that would be somewhat questionable, given the depth of the current AfD. Also, I would truly like to understand why DailyKos is considered unreliable as a source, and what other specific examples you have on problems with The Motley Moose article, especially considering WP:V. Thanks. I do appreciate your input. Ks64q2 (talk) 03:26, 17 March 2009 (UTC)