| Revision as of 00:17, 10 November 2005 edit24.18.171.99 (talk) →Help, please← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:16, 14 November 2005 edit undoTomber (talk | contribs)164 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ==Leicester Uni article== | |||
| Hi, thanks for sorting the photos out on the Leicester site, im very new to editing wikipeida articles, Leicester is the first one i have edited so any advice you give would be much appreciated. thanks tom. | |||
| ==Edit summary== | ==Edit summary== | ||
Revision as of 17:16, 14 November 2005
Leicester Uni article
Hi, thanks for sorting the photos out on the Leicester site, im very new to editing wikipeida articles, Leicester is the first one i have edited so any advice you give would be much appreciated. thanks tom.
Edit summary
Hello. Please remember to always provide an edit summary. Thanks and happy edits. Alphax 15:37, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Category:UK Wikipedians
Hi, just to let you know that the list of UK participants at the UK notice board was getting rather long, so I have replaced it with the above category which I have added to your user page. -- Francs2000 | Talk File:Uk flag large.png 30 June 2005 18:38 (UTC)
Reverts
Don't worry about reverts of simple vandalism, the 3rr doesn't apply to them. Remember to label reverts of simple vandalism, and report it on the vandalism in progress page. Stirling Newberry - Bopnews
Wittgenstein
The toned-down xtianity claim seems much better to me, thanks. Sorry about carelessly deleting the "works about" stuff in my edit... my bad. All the best. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 21:27, 2005 July 28 (UTC)
Spoo
Cool addition to Spoo - thanks! (And, by the way, if you didn't know, I've currently got it on Peer Review.) As for the book, The Real Frank Zappa Book, do you know what the ISBN and the publisher are? This is to keep my rather (copious) references up to date. Thanks for your time! --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 09:50, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
Help, please
You and I share an interest in Russell, among other things; I wrote a great deal of text on that a while back, and we worked together on the Welsh business. Anyway, I would like some help in preserving an article that my wife and I wrote on Michael Berumen. It's up for deletion, unfairly I believe. He is not a well-known philosopher, to be sure, but he has had some accomplishments that surpass the average professor test of notability, and I think given all of things we see in an encyclopedia whose founder desires to be "The sum of all knowledge," he at least deserves an article. Certainly as much as Spoo, for example?! Would you please take a look at it? I would greatly appreciate your support, that is, if you so choose. Thanks. icut4u
Please review the template:philosophy (navigation) and reconsider your vote
Since you voted (you said it was too large), the template has been streamlined to nearly half its former size.
Please consider revising your vote concerning template:Philosophy (navigation).