| Revision as of 01:46, 15 November 2005 editAntaeus Feldspar (talk | contribs)17,763 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:53, 15 November 2005 edit undoWBardwin (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers20,628 edits →[]: move to Misplaced Pages:Once upon a time...Next edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| *'''Delete''' as not-notable fiction. Put this on a blog, guys, not on Misplaced Pages. -- ] 01:32, 15 November 2005 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' as not-notable fiction. Put this on a blog, guys, not on Misplaced Pages. -- ] 01:32, 15 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Not encyclopedic. ] 01:39, 15 November 2005 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Not encyclopedic. ] 01:39, 15 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Move''' Misplaced Pages has an appropriate place for the creation of group fictional projects. I suggested this placement last month on The Swiss Knight's discussion page. See below. ] 01:53, 15 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::Better yet -- why not transfer the Swiss Knight and associated pages into ] - a project designed for writing "creative work" or "fiction." That quiet site has never really gotten off the ground, and your fine effort might create a spark there as well. Best Wishes. ] 02:30, 31 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:53, 15 November 2005
The Swiss Knight
Vanity page, utter nonsense, no real claim to notability, elaborate hoax, extensive joke, pick your favorite reason. -- malo (talk) 00:43, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Not funny. Ashibaka (tock) 00:46, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, this isn't the place for creating random fiction. - Bobet 00:53, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Don't Delete it should be known that all of the events written of did actually happen, with a couple minor adjustments to make them more spectacular. Gentlemen, if you kill this article, 1000 more shall spring up in its place, I beg of you to save the Knight and the justice he stands for.AshJW 00:58, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Don't Delete For saving the long hard work and dedication that went into this very true, and very interesting page.Opals25 20:04, 14 November 2005 (UTC) User's only edits are this AFD nom and user page.
- Delete. If not any of the above, certainly an extremely elaborate inside joke. --howcheng 01:10, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Don't Delete This article deserves to be here, not only as an entertaining read but as a lesson to all those who behold this story. It is indeed true, for I have paid witness to its events, and therefore there is no reason for this to be deleted unless you aspire to be a menace to all those who could benefit from this masterful article. What harm has this done to you, I ask? Silver Mobius 01:15, 15 November 2005 (UTC) Silver Mobius (talk · contribs) has two edits, both to this AfD.
- Whoa. Don't delete, userfy. Obviously inappropriate in the article namespace, but have you no humanity? Frutti di Mare 01:19, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Please note: I wish you hadn't just moved the page like that. If anything you have only made it more confusing for admins to settles this afd. -- malo (talk) 01:28, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. Sorry, I was being bold. I have indeed moved the article to User:AshJW/The Swiss Knight, and ask that an admin will kindly delete the redirect The Swiss Knight, as redirects from article space to userspace are improper. I'm sorry that the AFD template on the article consequently no longer links to this discussion. OTOH, the discussion has become kinda moot, why not just close it? Just my opinion. Frutti di Mare 01:35, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- The AfD template now works once again, since I've moved the article back from userspace. Userfication is one possible option open to us for resolving inappropriate material put into the article namespace. It is not an end run where you can just say "oh, maybe I shouldn't have done that but now that I have it's moot so don't worry your pretty little head over it." -- Antaeus Feldspar 01:46, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. Sorry, I was being bold. I have indeed moved the article to User:AshJW/The Swiss Knight, and ask that an admin will kindly delete the redirect The Swiss Knight, as redirects from article space to userspace are improper. I'm sorry that the AFD template on the article consequently no longer links to this discussion. OTOH, the discussion has become kinda moot, why not just close it? Just my opinion. Frutti di Mare 01:35, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Please note: I wish you hadn't just moved the page like that. If anything you have only made it more confusing for admins to settles this afd. -- malo (talk) 01:28, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Userify if possible otherwise Delete. I found it funny but utterly pointless. --W.marsh 01:21, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Don't DeleteThe legend of the Swiss Knight is not fiction(though embellished for drama) and should have a place here, as it hails some of the older myths present. If indeed[REDACTED] is a centre of knowledge then it would do well to host such a genre of thought that AshJW has put forth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by M1thrand1r (talk • contribs) 20:24, 14 November 2005 (UTC) This is M1thrand1r (talk · contribs)'s only edit.
- Delete as not-notable fiction. Put this on a blog, guys, not on Misplaced Pages. -- Antaeus Feldspar 01:32, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Not encyclopedic. Reyk 01:39, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Move Misplaced Pages has an appropriate place for the creation of group fictional projects. I suggested this placement last month on The Swiss Knight's discussion page. See below. WBardwin 01:53, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
::Better yet -- why not transfer the Swiss Knight and associated pages into Misplaced Pages:Once upon a time... - a project designed for writing "creative work" or "fiction." That quiet site has never really gotten off the ground, and your fine effort might create a spark there as well. Best Wishes. WBardwin 02:30, 31 October 2005 (UTC)