| Revision as of 20:54, 23 May 2009 editJehochman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers46,281 edits archive templates← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:02, 23 May 2009 edit undoMZMcBride (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users190,639 edits moved explanation to the top; easier to spotNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| The result was '''SPEEDY DELETE'''. ] <sup>]</sup> 20:54, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | The result was '''SPEEDY DELETE'''. ] <sup>]</sup> 20:54, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | I have taken the step of applying ] rather sooner than normal as there is no indication that the article meets criteria for inclusion in Misplaced Pages, ]. It has no references at all, is a biography of a living person, and there is contentious material in the history of the article and the talk page. Also noted, the subject has asked more than once for this to be deleted. Under the combined weight of circumstances, deletion is clearly justifiable. Now, I need to find the right templates for archiving this. ] <sup>]</sup> 20:50, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| <div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Boothroyd}}</ul></div> | <div class="infobox" style="width:50%">AfDs for this article:<ul class="listify">{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Boothroyd}}</ul></div> | ||
| Line 22: | Line 25: | ||
| * '''Delete'''; per suggestions of questionable notability (above) and the subject's that the article be removed. ] 20:47, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | * '''Delete'''; per suggestions of questionable notability (above) and the subject's that the article be removed. ] 20:47, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | I have taken the step of applying ] rather sooner than normal as there is no indication that the article meets criteria for inclusion in Misplaced Pages, ]. It has no references at all, is a biography of a living person, and there is contentious material in the history of the article and the talk page. Also noted, the subject has asked more than once for this to be deleted. Under the combined weight of circumstances, deletion is clearly justifiable. Now, I need to find the right templates for archiving this. ] <sup>]</sup> 20:50, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | ||
Revision as of 21:02, 23 May 2009
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was SPEEDY DELETE. Jehochman 20:54, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
I have taken the step of applying WP:SNOW rather sooner than normal as there is no indication that the article meets criteria for inclusion in Misplaced Pages, WP:CSD#A7. It has no references at all, is a biography of a living person, and there is contentious material in the history of the article and the talk page. Also noted, the subject has asked more than once for this to be deleted. Under the combined weight of circumstances, deletion is clearly justifiable. Now, I need to find the right templates for archiving this. Jehochman 20:50, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
David Boothroyd
AfDs for this article:- David Boothroyd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable, lack of sourcing. Does not meet our present notability standards for inclusion as a WP:BLP. Last AFD was nearly four years ago. rootology/equality 19:34, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and the subject wants it that way. Syn 19:36, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Should, in my mind, be deleted immediately for his sake. Nathan 19:37, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; and per Nathan. Too many problems. Ncmvocalist (talk) 19:40, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment. The subject repeats his request made four years ago for deletion. DavidBoothroyd (talk) 20:14, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - although I am concerned with the nom and the timing of it, the subject has expressed interest in deletion and a google search found only a few entries, most no longer than two or three lines and from primary sources, with little news to justify keeping an article against the subject's will. Ottava Rima (talk) 20:19, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Conti|✉ 20:40, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete; per suggestions of questionable notability (above) and the subject's request that the article be removed. AGK 20:47, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.