| Revision as of 23:51, 23 May 2009 editDreamGuy (talk | contribs)33,601 edits →Flashbacks (comics)← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:04, 24 May 2009 edit undoBOZ (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users127,904 edits K or MNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| *'''Keep''' Nothing wrong with plot summaries, that's how every book article is anyway. The story was notable enough to be reprinted in a hardcover book, along with other notable tales. The comic and the hardcover reprint are reviewed by third party media sources, such as IGN. ]''' 22:41, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' Nothing wrong with plot summaries, that's how every book article is anyway. The story was notable enough to be reprinted in a hardcover book, along with other notable tales. The comic and the hardcover reprint are reviewed by third party media sources, such as IGN. ]''' 22:41, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ::I have to ask: Have you ever actually read any of our policies? I see you vote Keep on tons of AFDs with rationales that in no way, shape or form follow the rules of this site. Long plot summaries are specifically mentioned on ] as unacceptable here, and merely being reprinted or trivially discussed on some fan sites is not even close to a justification for having a Misplaced Pages article. ] (]) 23:51, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | ::I have to ask: Have you ever actually read any of our policies? I see you vote Keep on tons of AFDs with rationales that in no way, shape or form follow the rules of this site. Long plot summaries are specifically mentioned on ] as unacceptable here, and merely being reprinted or trivially discussed on some fan sites is not even close to a justification for having a Misplaced Pages article. ] (]) 23:51, 23 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' if possible, or '''merge/redirect''' to ]. ] (]) 00:04, 24 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:04, 24 May 2009
Flashbacks (comics)
- Flashbacks (comics) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article focuses on a single issue of Amazing Spider-Man, and is mainly a plot summary. I don't think this one issue is important enough to warrant its own article. Sandor Clegane (talk) 23:02, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete There doesn't even appear to be any attempt to come up with even a half-assed attempt at claiming it's notable. DreamGuy (talk) 23:09, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete In universe, no sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • 23:16, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. —J Greb (talk) 00:24, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Nothing wrong with plot summaries, that's how every book article is anyway. The story was notable enough to be reprinted in a hardcover book, along with other notable tales. The comic and the hardcover reprint are reviewed by third party media sources, such as IGN. Dream Focus 22:41, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- I have to ask: Have you ever actually read any of our policies? I see you vote Keep on tons of AFDs with rationales that in no way, shape or form follow the rules of this site. Long plot summaries are specifically mentioned on WP:NOT as unacceptable here, and merely being reprinted or trivially discussed on some fan sites is not even close to a justification for having a Misplaced Pages article. DreamGuy (talk) 23:51, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Keep if possible, or merge/redirect to Fictional history of Spider-Man. BOZ (talk) 00:04, 24 May 2009 (UTC)