| Revision as of 16:57, 25 November 2005 editHahnchen (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers12,014 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:18, 25 November 2005 edit undoJoshuacUK (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers9,361 edits →[]: objectNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| :Peer Review: ] -] 11:37, 25 November 2005 (UTC) | :Peer Review: ] -] 11:37, 25 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Oppose''' - Is it not possible to fork this article out? It's so long, 100 kilobytes, and looks very text heavy. - ] 16:57, 25 November 2005 (UTC) | *'''Oppose''' - Is it not possible to fork this article out? It's so long, 100 kilobytes, and looks very text heavy. - ] 16:57, 25 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Object''' Impressive, but much too long. It needs a good copy-edit to get it down to a decent size. — ] 18:18, 25 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:18, 25 November 2005
Palpatine
I'm nominating this. It is a comprehensive article, which is well-written, referenced, sourced, picture-ied, discussed etc. I've implemented most of Peer Review's suggestions, and I really see no reason why Palpatine couldn't be a Featured Article; it would be pretty neat- AFAIK, our first Star Wars FA. --Maru (talk) Contribs 04:51, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
- The additional material was really unnecessary. It was a good, though bloated, article beforehand. Today's changes have largely succeeded in making it fatter with poor grammar and a variety of short, choppy sentences in the opening segment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.2.15.144 (talk • contribs)
- I feel I should note that the preceding comment is from an anonymous user's whose removal of references on Palpatine I've reverted twice now. --Maru (talk) Contribs 06:14, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - Is it not possible to fork this article out? It's so long, 100 kilobytes, and looks very text heavy. - Hahnchen 16:57, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
- Object Impressive, but much too long. It needs a good copy-edit to get it down to a decent size. — Wackymacs 18:18, 25 November 2005 (UTC)