Misplaced Pages

User talk:PirateSmackK: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:37, 31 May 2009 editMajorly (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers38,677 edits →May 2009: addendum← Previous edit Revision as of 15:41, 31 May 2009 edit undoToddst1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors137,759 edits →May 2009: ::No this editor has a history of power-lust and disruption. This is to prevent further problems. This is about the most egregious attempt at deception I've seen in wiki.Next edit →
Line 20: Line 20:


:Wow, punitive or what. An edit from two days is somehow problematic today? I'm sure EVula isn't silly enough to go promoting people to admin anyway, who shouldn't be. ''']''' ] 15:37, 31 May 2009 (UTC) :Wow, punitive or what. An edit from two days is somehow problematic today? I'm sure EVula isn't silly enough to go promoting people to admin anyway, who shouldn't be. ''']''' ] 15:37, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
::No this editor has a history of power-lust and disruption. This is to prevent further problems. This is about the most egregious attempt at deception I've seen in wiki. ] <small>(])</small> 15:41, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:41, 31 May 2009

User talk:PirateSmackK/Header

This is PirateSmackK's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.



FYI

So much for being BOLD. Majorly talk 14:33, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

May 2009

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for Continued disruption and outright deception including an attempt to trick a bureaucrat to granting admin rights . If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 15:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Wow, punitive or what. An edit from two days is somehow problematic today? I'm sure EVula isn't silly enough to go promoting people to admin anyway, who shouldn't be. Majorly talk 15:37, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
No this editor has a history of power-lust and disruption. This is to prevent further problems. This is about the most egregious attempt at deception I've seen in wiki. Toddst1 (talk) 15:41, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Category: