Misplaced Pages

User talk:PirateSmackK: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:08, 31 May 2009 editClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,379,848 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:PirateSmackK/2009/May. (BOT)← Previous edit Revision as of 16:11, 31 May 2009 edit undoIronholds (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers79,705 edits →May 2009: rNext edit →
Line 20: Line 20:


*Also see his Encyclopedia Dramatica efforts, replying to (remove the *, spamblacklist you see with something (which has now been hidden, odd, but User:Mentifisto will back me up on this) reading along the lines of "lol, I'm just enjoying the drama at the moment". ] (]) 16:04, 31 May 2009 (UTC) *Also see his Encyclopedia Dramatica efforts, replying to (remove the *, spamblacklist you see with something (which has now been hidden, odd, but User:Mentifisto will back me up on this) reading along the lines of "lol, I'm just enjoying the drama at the moment". ] (]) 16:04, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
*:I do note, however, that you were the original admin who brought him up at ANI and started the ball rolling. Considering your prior involvement (and I'm not suggesting you're biased against him, I'm suggesting others might say you are) perhaps you should bring this up at ANI and see if people approve of the block. ] (]) 16:11, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:11, 31 May 2009

User talk:PirateSmackK/Header

This is PirateSmackK's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.



May 2009

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for Continued disruption and outright deception including an attempt to trick a bureaucrat to granting admin rights . If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 15:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Wow, punitive or what. An edit from two days is somehow problematic today? I'm sure EVula isn't silly enough to go promoting people to admin anyway, who shouldn't be. Majorly talk 15:37, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
No this editor has a history of power-lust and disruption. 1, 2, 3 This is to end this and prevent further problems. This is about the most egregious attempt at deception I've seen on wiki. Toddst1 (talk) 15:41, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
The only reason PiratesmackK isn't already blocked is because he agreed to undergo a period of supervised editing and mentoring. I think something like this completely undermines the idea that he's trying to change. He was not blocked if he agreed to be a good user. He wasn't a good user. Therefore, he should be blocked. Ironholds (talk) 16:00, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
  • Also see his Encyclopedia Dramatica efforts, replying to this (remove the *, spamblacklist you see with something (which has now been hidden, odd, but User:Mentifisto will back me up on this) reading along the lines of "lol, I'm just enjoying the drama at the moment". Ironholds (talk) 16:04, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
    I do note, however, that you were the original admin who brought him up at ANI and started the ball rolling. Considering your prior involvement (and I'm not suggesting you're biased against him, I'm suggesting others might say you are) perhaps you should bring this up at ANI and see if people approve of the block. Ironholds (talk) 16:11, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Category: