| Revision as of 22:19, 2 June 2009 editSarekOfVulcan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators51,820 edits fixed stray sig← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:24, 2 June 2009 edit undoTfz (talk | contribs)2,229 edits Question about SarekOfVulcan removal of talk page contentNext edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| Its patently clear that nothing practical can come from discussion on this page (with regards to the title). '''Nothing'''. ArbCom have made that so with their move sanction. The only way anything is going to change is through ]. So, I urge you all: if you genuinely have an interest in resolving this dispute, engage there. Ignore any further comments on this page about the article title, since it has turned into a ]. POV pushing does not need to be countered here, because any attempts to use the artificial "consensus" to justify a change in the title/content will result in a block (as Domer found out yesterday). Just ignore it, and instead focus on the forum where a practical solution ''can'' be found. 22:00, 2 June 2009 (UTC) | Its patently clear that nothing practical can come from discussion on this page (with regards to the title). '''Nothing'''. ArbCom have made that so with their move sanction. The only way anything is going to change is through ]. So, I urge you all: if you genuinely have an interest in resolving this dispute, engage there. Ignore any further comments on this page about the article title, since it has turned into a ]. POV pushing does not need to be countered here, because any attempts to use the artificial "consensus" to justify a change in the title/content will result in a block (as Domer found out yesterday). Just ignore it, and instead focus on the forum where a practical solution ''can'' be found. 22:00, 2 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == Question about SarekOfVulcan removal of talk page content == | |||
| SarekOfVulcan maintains that ArbCom has banned discussion of the naming of the RoI article on the RoI talk page. My question to SarekOfVulcan is this, "show differences and the relevant pages/paragraphs of the ArbCom decision?". Otherwise this will be seen as a unilateral action by an admin. ] ] 22:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:24, 2 June 2009
Template:Outline of knowledge coverage Template:IECOLL-talk
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Republic of Ireland article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
|
To-do list is empty: remove {{To do}} tag or click on edit to add an item. |
 | A fact from this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the On this day section on December 29, 2004 and December 29, 2005. |
Archiving more misplaced discussion
It doesn't go here. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:15, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Suggestion
Why are we having these same article title discussions again and again and again? Redking7, I swear you have cut and pasted that same post numerous times on different pages, including twice on this page in the last few days. It is nothing more than forum shopping, and will have no more of a constructive effect than it did the last time you pasted it. We understand your argument. We don't necessarily agree with it, but simply repeating it will not change that.
Its patently clear that nothing practical can come from discussion on this page (with regards to the title). Nothing. ArbCom have made that so with their move sanction. The only way anything is going to change is through WT:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration. So, I urge you all: if you genuinely have an interest in resolving this dispute, engage there. Ignore any further comments on this page about the article title, since it has turned into a talking shop. POV pushing does not need to be countered here, because any attempts to use the artificial "consensus" to justify a change in the title/content will result in a block (as Domer found out yesterday). Just ignore it, and instead focus on the forum where a practical solution can be found. 22:00, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Question about SarekOfVulcan removal of talk page content
SarekOfVulcan maintains that ArbCom has banned discussion of the naming of the RoI article on the RoI talk page. My question to SarekOfVulcan is this, "show differences and the relevant pages/paragraphs of the ArbCom decision?". Otherwise this will be seen as a unilateral action by an admin. Tfz 22:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Categories:- All unassessed articles
- B-Class Ireland articles
- Top-importance Ireland articles
- B-Class Ireland articles of Top-importance
- All WikiProject Ireland pages
- WikiProject templates with unknown parameters
- B-Class country articles
- WikiProject Countries articles
- B-Class Irish republicanism articles
- Top-importance Irish republicanism articles
- WikiProject Irish republicanism articles
- Misplaced Pages pages with to-do lists
- Misplaced Pages pages with to-do lists, unused
- Selected anniversaries (December 2004)
- Selected anniversaries (December 2005)