Misplaced Pages

:Good article reassessment/Homeopathy/1: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Good article reassessment Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:59, 4 June 2009 editNootherIDAvailable (talk | contribs)200 edits Created page with '{{subst:GAR/header}} <!-- Please add the rationale for reassessment below this comment. Subsequent discussion should be added below, until the reassessment is close…'  Revision as of 07:34, 4 June 2009 edit undoBrunton (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,763 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
<!-- Please add the rationale for reassessment below this comment. Subsequent discussion should be added below, until the reassessment is closed.--> <!-- Please add the rationale for reassessment below this comment. Subsequent discussion should be added below, until the reassessment is closed.-->
This article was nominated for being a Featured Article, but a lot of people opposed it. I now oppose it being a Good Article as well, for the same reasons-mainly because every sentence/statement is criticised and no defense is being allowed.-] (]) 02:59, 4 June 2009 (UTC) This article was nominated for being a Featured Article, but a lot of people opposed it. I now oppose it being a Good Article as well, for the same reasons-mainly because every sentence/statement is criticised and no defense is being allowed.-] (]) 02:59, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
:FA discussion can be seen . ] (]) 07:34, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:34, 4 June 2009

Homeopathy

Article (edit | visual edit | history· Article talk (edit | history· WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result pending

This article was nominated for being a Featured Article, but a lot of people opposed it. I now oppose it being a Good Article as well, for the same reasons-mainly because every sentence/statement is criticised and no defense is being allowed.-NootherIDAvailable (talk) 02:59, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

FA discussion can be seen here. Brunton (talk) 07:34, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Category: