| Revision as of 11:12, 9 June 2009 editMusicInTheHouse (talk | contribs)2,744 edits →Cite tags: new section← Previous edit |
Revision as of 11:51, 9 June 2009 edit undoMusicInTheHouse (talk | contribs)2,744 edits rv per bigdunc's answerNext edit → |
| Line 11: |
Line 11: |
|
|On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. |
|
|On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. |
|
|} ] (]) 12:56, 23 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|} ] (]) 12:56, 23 May 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
== Cite tags == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, just wondering since when is adding cite tags to text considered disrupting Misplaced Pages? I actually believe it is removing them that is considered vandalism. I have no issue in having them removed if a reason is actually given, rather than describing their addition as disruptive for no reason. Usually when something is mentioned the first time their is a citation, hence why the fact tags were added. Can you explain their removal?] 11:12, 9 June 2009 (UTC) |
|
