Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 16:33, 24 June 2009

Welcome

Hello, Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Misplaced Pages. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Misplaced Pages you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! DocteurCosmos (talk) 12:22, 23 June 2009 (UTC) Getting Started Misplaced Pages Tutorial • The five pillars of Misplaced Pages How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Misplaced Pages is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Leo John

You have not given a valid speedy delete reason for this article. Criteria for speedy deletion are given at WP:CSD and your reasoning does not meet any of the criteria hence the article is not suitable for speedy deletion. Additionally according to WP:DP#Speedy deletion speedy deletion tags should not normally be re-added once another editor (who isn't the page creator) has removed them. If you want this page deleted you should use the WP:PROD or WP:AfD processes. Dpmuk (talk) 15:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Come on, a minor character in one film, presented as a real person? --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 15:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

I'll add that I'm not fundementally against this page being deleted - I haven't investiagted it enough to form an opinion on whether we should have an article or not. However I am against the article being speedied as a) it doesn't meet any of the criteria and b) I believe there should be more discussion than would occur with a speedy deletion. Dpmuk (talk) 15:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Naga the serpent

Please see the talk page for this article, I believe it should accurately convey the reasons behind the edits, and the justification of them using official wikipedia policy. The removal of the content is in order to improve the pages many issues, it's a awful example of a character article Dandy Sephy (talk) 14:44, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Naga the Serpent. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 15:11, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

oh geez, come on. Do we need a drama? --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 15:15, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

I'd suggest you check the attitude and read up on WP:CIVIL as well as WP:EDITWAR before you get yourself blocked. Your actions at Naga the Serpent are inappropriate and you are edit warring. Discuss it on the talk page, but frankly you have no leg to stand on. You cannot just say "go watch the episode" or whatever to back up claims interpreting the motivations/thoughts, etc of characters. The original work can only source actual plot summary, not attempts to decide what something means, and especially that nama=naga if it is not explicitly said in the series. That is WP:OR as has already been pointed out to you on the talk page. You need reliable, third party-sources to back up the claims you are making. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 15:20, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

NO U are edit warring. Tell me what's your problem and I'll give you a screenshot or whatever you need. That's the First Party-Sources. Or maybe define the other "reliable sources" in this case. Oh, and I didn't even write this stuff (only just cleaned up), but it's simply true. Stuff cen be rewritten (I do this!), but you come and delete everything, even such stuff like there are clones or the Shadow Copy Naga has very different character. But for what exactly reason? --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 15:22, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Please stop linking to illegal content. You are violating Misplaced Pages's WP:COPYRIGHT policies. And screenshots are not sources. You are the only one edit warring here. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 16:17, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

"Am" (was) I edit warring with myself? Are you me? YT is "illegal" now? --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 16:21, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Game Over (video game)

Hi Ostateczny - would you consider using the talk page to write clearly about how you think the article can be improved? Rather than just posting a photo only indirectly related to the subject. You are expected to discuss articles with objectivity and civility. Looking at your comments above, I also suggest you review WP:CIVIL. Thanks, Marasmusine (talk) 15:58, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Nipples being suddenly evil, even on talk page? Geez, guys. --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 16:02, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for removing the image. Marasmusine (talk) 16:09, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

You just floored me. This image illustrates nipple, you know. --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 16:10, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure that you understand. That it was a nipple is irrelevant. I asked you to remove the photo because it was not directly related to the talk page's subject. If you have comments about the game's cover artwork, say so objectively and concisely with words. Marasmusine (talk) 16:21, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Well, the article discusses the nipple pic while not showing nipple (picture censored, cropped by uploader). While wikipedia shows nipples (not only there, a lot of nipples and even vaginas and penises and all that). --Ostateczny Krach Systemu Korporacji (talk) 16:33, 24 June 2009 (UTC)