| Revision as of 04:16, 25 June 2009 editChed (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users64,984 edits →Hey Steve: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:00, 25 June 2009 edit undoSteven Crossin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors39,772 edits →Hey Steve: Reply.Next edit → | ||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
| I apologize for not being more timely in responding. I won't even go into the "why or where" items. Regarding your RFAQ. I think they are good questions. One item I'd like to point out though, is on question number 2. You make the assumption that administrators are to be mediation functionaries. Actually, according to ], admins do not resolve disputes. I think it's a good question to ask, but perhaps in a more neutral manner. (without making the assumption that it is a function of an admin.). Now I do realize that in practice, it does happen - but I don't think it should be an ''assumption'' of what admins do. Just IMHO buddy. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 04:16, 25 June 2009 (UTC) | I apologize for not being more timely in responding. I won't even go into the "why or where" items. Regarding your RFAQ. I think they are good questions. One item I'd like to point out though, is on question number 2. You make the assumption that administrators are to be mediation functionaries. Actually, according to ], admins do not resolve disputes. I think it's a good question to ask, but perhaps in a more neutral manner. (without making the assumption that it is a function of an admin.). Now I do realize that in practice, it does happen - but I don't think it should be an ''assumption'' of what admins do. Just IMHO buddy. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 04:16, 25 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :Hm, I'm having difficulty explaining what I'm trying it to say. I'm basically asking the candidate where they have prior experience in resolving disputes. While, yes, admins don't normally do DR, I'm thinking of day to day things such as edit warring, page protection, and so on. This is, at a basic level, a dispute, and while administrators don't need to actively resolve disputes, they should at least be aware of how to resolve a situation peacefully and effectively. This way, they could determine the best possible solution to the certain situation in question. Does any of that make sense? I tried calling you to explain my thoughts more....but I guess you're snoozing. <font face="Forte">] <sup>]</sup></font> 06:00, 25 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:00, 25 June 2009
|
User:Steve Crossin/harassment-awareness
Re: WebCite
Hey Steve, retrieving from WebCite is really simple. Let me toss a few bits of code your way:
- To check if a URL is in WebCite:
javascript:void(location.href='http://www.webcitation.org/query.php?url='+escape(location.href)) - To archive a website:
javascript:void(location.href='http://www.webcitation.org/archive?url='+escape(location.href)+'&email=ADD EMAIL ADDRESS HERE')
If you know how to create buttons in the Bookmarks toolbar, in either Firefox or IE, then just create a button for each of the snippits above. When you go to a website, you can use the first snippit to check if there is already an archive, and you can use the second snippit to automatically archive that page. You can also go to the WebCitation website and plug in a URL to check if it is in the archive, but the above method is definitely faster. If you need any help getting the buttons up and running, just let me know. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 22:28, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, assuming you have the toolbar running (if not, click "View", "Toolbars" and "Bookmarks Toolbar"), right click in an empty space and click New Bookmark. Give it a name such as "WebCite check", then in the location field paste the first snippit above. Repeat the process for the second snippit, using a name like "WebCite archive" or just "Archive", and make sure to replace the "ADD EMAIL ADDRESS HERE" bit with an actual email address, so you can store links to the different sites you've archived. I've set up my Yahoo email account to automatically route such emails to a separate folder so everything stays tidy and out of the way. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 22:38, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, the archive function of the site has apparently been down for a little while. They may be doing maintenance, or there may be problems. Just keep checking back ever so often. The snippit will work, the problem is just on their end. :) — Huntster (t • @ • c) 22:51, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
FYI, you could also do the same for Internet Archive's Wayback Machine:
javascript:void(location.href='http://web.archive.org/web/*/'+escape(location.href))
- ALLST✰R▼ wuz here @ 01:33, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
- Sure, but I don't like the wayback machine :P Steve Crossin /Help us mediate! 01:34, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I don't like webcitation.org 'cause they don't have anything in the archives! At least nothing I looked for. :P - ALLST✰R▼ wuz here @ 02:37, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
RfA thanks
|
Thank you for participating in my RfA, which succeeded with 56 in support, 12 in opposition and 3 neutral votes. I am truly honored by the trust that the community has placed in me. Whether you supported me, opposed me, or if you only posted questions or commented om my RfA, I thank you for your input and I will be looking at the reasons that people opposed me so I can improve in those areas :). If you ever need anything please feel free to ask me and I would be happy to help you :). All the Best, Mifter (talk) |
Mifter (talk) 23:56, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you I was unaware! Wikifan12345 (talk) 10:37, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
- You're most welcome ^_^. Steve Crossin /Help us mediate! 10:54, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Pic
Nice new image BTW. Classy. - ALLST✰R▼ wuz here @ 02:39, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, had it for a month or so, decided to upload a new one. Got bored of the old one. Steve Crossin /Help us mediate! 02:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Bob Allen
That is a fair point; he was in fact convicted and failed to have it overturned at the district court level also. Obviously this man is known largely for his arrest and the implied hypocrisy; however, as it was written the article was little more than a coat rack for the arrest and I think that one should seek to balance the conviction with other details of his career. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 22:41, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Thank you
Hey Steve, I know I haven't gotten out the thank you notes as fast as I hoped, but I did want to drop you off a Thank You!!! ASAP. I really appreciate your faith in me, and your strong support, ... as well as all the help you've given me here. Thank you very very much buddy. Cheers mate! — Ched : ? 17:57, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
- You're most welcome. :) Thanks for the personalised thankspam :) Steve Crossin /Help us mediate! 21:44, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Mediation Cabal Cases: List of Avengers members
I am not sure why you closed this: Misplaced Pages:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2009-01-08/List of Avengers members. It is still open. What is under mediation is what source can be used since their is a conflict in the source over D-Man's membership. The other side does not want any questionable category. Spshu (talk) 18:58, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- Hello. Closing the case was more of a procedural action rather than actually acknowledging that there had been any formal resolution of the situation. The case had been open for over four months at the time, and in my experience, stale mediation cases generally require a fresh approach in a new case. Recycling is good, but not for everything, and in my opinion, not for mediation. My suggestion to you would be if there are still issues, to request formal mediation with the Mediation Committee. Best, Steve Crossin 09:29, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Hey Steve
I apologize for not being more timely in responding. I won't even go into the "why or where" items. Regarding your RFAQ. I think they are good questions. One item I'd like to point out though, is on question number 2. You make the assumption that administrators are to be mediation functionaries. Actually, according to Misplaced Pages:Requests for administrator attention, admins do not resolve disputes. I think it's a good question to ask, but perhaps in a more neutral manner. (without making the assumption that it is a function of an admin.). Now I do realize that in practice, it does happen - but I don't think it should be an assumption of what admins do. Just IMHO buddy. — Ched : ? 04:16, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- Hm, I'm having difficulty explaining what I'm trying it to say. I'm basically asking the candidate where they have prior experience in resolving disputes. While, yes, admins don't normally do DR, I'm thinking of day to day things such as edit warring, page protection, and so on. This is, at a basic level, a dispute, and while administrators don't need to actively resolve disputes, they should at least be aware of how to resolve a situation peacefully and effectively. This way, they could determine the best possible solution to the certain situation in question. Does any of that make sense? I tried calling you to explain my thoughts more....but I guess you're snoozing. Steve Crossin 06:00, 25 June 2009 (UTC)