| Revision as of 23:42, 30 June 2009 editCaspian blue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,434 editsm →Hunting of the Snark - Plates 1–10← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:13, 1 July 2009 edit undoOttava Rima (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,327 edits responseNext edit → | ||
| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
| :********Seriously, check your settings. Images, unless you do what you did, only display as many in a section as the width of the browser. They do not go beyond unless you force them. For whatever reason, your settings removed that standard feature. ] (]) 23:36, 30 June 2009 (UTC) | :********Seriously, check your settings. Images, unless you do what you did, only display as many in a section as the width of the browser. They do not go beyond unless you force them. For whatever reason, your settings removed that standard feature. ] (]) 23:36, 30 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :*********Ney, I rather recommend you to check ''your system''. I've checked the layout with "two computers". What inch is your computer monitor? (By the way, I thought you'd say at least "thank you" for your time, grumble...) Or you can ask others about this.--] 23:40, 30 June 2009 (UTC) | :*********Ney, I rather recommend you to check ''your system''. I've checked the layout with "two computers". What inch is your computer monitor? (By the way, I thought you'd say at least "thank you" for your time, grumble...) Or you can ask others about this.--] 23:40, 30 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :**********With the original set up, I've changed the settings of my monitor and also shrunk the width of the computer. It formats with two wide unless the width is shrunk and then it becomes one. I have also talked to a chatroom of people and they also experienced the same thing. The problem is only on your end, and I will restore the settings above so people do not have to deal with that annoying horizontal bar. You also destroyed the order of the set, which is highly inappropriate. ] (]) 00:13, 1 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- additional votes go above this line --> | <!-- additional votes go above this line --> | ||
| {{-}} | {{-}} | ||
Revision as of 00:13, 1 July 2009
Hunting of the Snark - Plates 1–10
 |
 |
 |
   The least likeness to what he had been: While so great was his fright that his waistcoat turned white-- A wonderful thing to be seen! Original scan: File:Lewis Carroll - Henry Holiday - Hunting of the Snark - Plate 9 unrestored.png |
 "But oh, beamish nephew, beware of the day, If your Snark be a Boojum! For then You will softly and suddenly vanish away, And never be met with again!" Original scan: File:Lewis Carroll - Henry Holiday - Hunting of the Snark - Plate 5 unrestored.png  They persued it with forks and hope; They threatened its life with a railway-share; They charmed it with smiles and soap. Original scan: File:Lewis Carroll - Henry Holiday - Hunting of the Snark - Plate 6 unrestored.png |
 And ink in unfailing supplies: While strange creepy creatures came out of their dens, And watched them with wondering eyes. Original scan: File:Lewis Carroll - Henry Holiday - Hunting of the Snark - Plate 7 unrestored.png  In the midst of his laughter and glee, He had softly and suddenly vanished away-- For the Snark was a Boojum, you see. Original scan: File:Lewis Carroll - Henry Holiday - Hunting of the Snark - Plate 10 unrestored.png | |
- Reason
- These engravings were created with Lewis Carroll's assistance and approval, which makes them have very high encyclopedic value for the poem. They are all restored images. See above for the rest. This is a featured picture set nomination.
- Articles this image appears in
- The Hunting of the Snark
- Creator
- Henry Holiday
- Support as nominator --Ottava Rima (talk) 01:47, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Comment please state clearly in the nomination that these are restored images and provide links to the corresponding unrestored filenames. Durova 02:29, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Done. Ottava Rima (talk) 03:14, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Question Is this a nomination for a Featured Picture Set? Please make that clear in the nom.--HereToHelp 15:07, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Done. Ottava Rima (talk) 15:16, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. :) Durova 16:52, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- The arrangement of the images is not good for viewers, l would you reduce the image sizes a bit and rearrange them for better looking? But overall those are interesting and good in shape.--Caspian blue 05:43, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- The images are currently arranged in order, as the set would also follow in the order (as intended as illustrations for the poem). What size would you suggest that they be changed to? The current size fits within my browser with extra space (2 per line). Is this different for other browsers? Ottava Rima (talk) 16:29, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe a gallery would be more helpful. This takes up a lot of space. wadester16 20:30, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- That's what I thought, but I was not sure whether using a gallery template is allowed for FP nomination. For close evaluation, viewers have to click and see each image in the originally uploaded size anyway. --Caspian blue 20:34, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not really seeing a problem here, as the formatting doesn't seem to push them over the edge, and no one so far has actually bothered to look at the pictures and review them. Can we please have some supports or objections based on the criteria? I really don't care about the formatting of the nomination and I already changed it about 8 times. If someone else thinks they can do better, then please feel free to. Ottava Rima (talk) 20:39, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Done on the formatting to save the space and to present a better alignment of the images. 3 rows are better than 5 rows in this case? :)--Caspian blue 21:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Um, so you know, there were only 2 rows before. Perhaps your computer has formatting problems. Ottava Rima (talk) 22:05, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Meh, I don't think so. I bought my computer just one week ago and I'm using Firefox.--Caspian blue 22:08, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Seriously, check your settings. Images, unless you do what you did, only display as many in a section as the width of the browser. They do not go beyond unless you force them. For whatever reason, your settings removed that standard feature. Ottava Rima (talk) 23:36, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Ney, I rather recommend you to check your system. I've checked the layout with "two computers". What inch is your computer monitor? (By the way, I thought you'd say at least "thank you" for your time, grumble...) Or you can ask others about this.--Caspian blue 23:40, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- With the original set up, I've changed the settings of my monitor and also shrunk the width of the computer. It formats with two wide unless the width is shrunk and then it becomes one. I have also talked to a chatroom of people and they also experienced the same thing. The problem is only on your end, and I will restore the settings above so people do not have to deal with that annoying horizontal bar. You also destroyed the order of the set, which is highly inappropriate. Ottava Rima (talk) 00:13, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Ney, I rather recommend you to check your system. I've checked the layout with "two computers". What inch is your computer monitor? (By the way, I thought you'd say at least "thank you" for your time, grumble...) Or you can ask others about this.--Caspian blue 23:40, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Seriously, check your settings. Images, unless you do what you did, only display as many in a section as the width of the browser. They do not go beyond unless you force them. For whatever reason, your settings removed that standard feature. Ottava Rima (talk) 23:36, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Meh, I don't think so. I bought my computer just one week ago and I'm using Firefox.--Caspian blue 22:08, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Um, so you know, there were only 2 rows before. Perhaps your computer has formatting problems. Ottava Rima (talk) 22:05, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not really seeing a problem here, as the formatting doesn't seem to push them over the edge, and no one so far has actually bothered to look at the pictures and review them. Can we please have some supports or objections based on the criteria? I really don't care about the formatting of the nomination and I already changed it about 8 times. If someone else thinks they can do better, then please feel free to. Ottava Rima (talk) 20:39, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- That's what I thought, but I was not sure whether using a gallery template is allowed for FP nomination. For close evaluation, viewers have to click and see each image in the originally uploaded size anyway. --Caspian blue 20:34, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe a gallery would be more helpful. This takes up a lot of space. wadester16 20:30, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- The images are currently arranged in order, as the set would also follow in the order (as intended as illustrations for the poem). What size would you suggest that they be changed to? The current size fits within my browser with extra space (2 per line). Is this different for other browsers? Ottava Rima (talk) 16:29, 30 June 2009 (UTC)