| Revision as of 03:47, 12 July 2009 editAvraham (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Administrators49,190 edits →Latuff image: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:34, 12 July 2009 edit undoAvraham (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Administrators49,190 edits →Latuff image: explanationNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| The picture was considered a BLP violation (see the talk page) and it was protected from being posted. Adambro improperly deleted the protective measures, which may have been an abuse of his administrative rights. I have restored the protection. As the image is a BLP violation, we do not show it on EnWiki; we link to it in the footnotes. Thank you. -- ] (]) 03:47, 12 July 2009 (UTC) | The picture was considered a BLP violation (see the talk page) and it was protected from being posted. Adambro improperly deleted the protective measures, which may have been an abuse of his administrative rights. I have restored the protection. As the image is a BLP violation, we do not show it on EnWiki; we link to it in the footnotes. Thank you. -- ] (]) 03:47, 12 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :It is acceptable for the commons; it is a ] violation for EnWiki. Please ee the talk page. Thank you. -- ] (]) 14:34, 12 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:34, 12 July 2009
 Archives |
Latuff image
The picture was considered a BLP violation (see the talk page) and it was protected from being posted. Adambro improperly deleted the protective measures, which may have been an abuse of his administrative rights. I have restored the protection. As the image is a BLP violation, we do not show it on EnWiki; we link to it in the footnotes. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 03:47, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
- It is acceptable for the commons; it is a WP:BLP violation for EnWiki. Please ee the talk page. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 14:34, 12 July 2009 (UTC)