| Revision as of 10:31, 26 July 2009 editLittle Professor (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,189 edits rm rant #2← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:58, 26 July 2009 edit undoWildhartlivie (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,910 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on John Dillinger. using TWNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == July 2009 == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:John Dillinger|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''How productive is that? You've actually violated ] since your very first removal of this content was a revert from your first change on July 13. revert removed the content, which had been returned after you removed it . Your was this one, your and then . In fact, rather than template you for it, I attempted to discuss this with you, only to be met with bad faith snarky edit summaries and removal of my attempts under a bad faith edit summary referencing removing rants. An administrator has now reverted your last removal and if you persist with this, I will file a notice with ] since any good faith attempts to discuss this with you has been met with rebuff. You obviously do not have a clear understanding of why this "helpful hidden comment", as ], the administrator, called is necessary and don't care. Careful now, if you revert this again, I will take it to ]. '' ] (]) 16:58, 26 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:58, 26 July 2009
July 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on John Dillinger. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. How productive is that? You've actually violated WP:3RR since your very first removal of this content was a revert from your first change on July 13. Your first revert removed the content, which had been returned after you removed it . Your second revert was this one, your third revert and then your fourth revert. In fact, rather than template you for it, I attempted to discuss this with you, only to be met with bad faith snarky edit summaries and removal of my attempts under a bad faith edit summary referencing removing rants. An administrator has now reverted your last removal and if you persist with this, I will file a notice with WP:AN/I since any good faith attempts to discuss this with you has been met with rebuff. You obviously do not have a clear understanding of why this "helpful hidden comment", as Garion96, the administrator, called is necessary and don't care. Careful now, if you revert this again, I will take it to WP:AN/I. Wildhartlivie (talk) 16:58, 26 July 2009 (UTC)