Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/National Portrait Gallery copyright conflicts: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:37, 27 July 2009 editRayAYang (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,188 edits National Portrait Gallery copyright conflicts: del← Previous edit Revision as of 23:38, 27 July 2009 edit undoViperSnake151 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers109,463 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
Non-notable nor could it be established as notable based on searches for confirmation. Only one source provided discusses it, and it has very little reliability and is unprofessional (see: "bitchslap" in title). Misplaced Pages is not news, nor is it a collection of random poorly sourced information that speculates on possible legal events, especially from non-experts to provide reliable sources for said speculation. ] (]) 23:31, 27 July 2009 (UTC) Non-notable nor could it be established as notable based on searches for confirmation. Only one source provided discusses it, and it has very little reliability and is unprofessional (see: "bitchslap" in title). Misplaced Pages is not news, nor is it a collection of random poorly sourced information that speculates on possible legal events, especially from non-experts to provide reliable sources for said speculation. ] (]) 23:31, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' Misplaced Pages is not news, as the nominator said. Furthermore, the Wikinews is vastly more informative, this really has nothing to add. <strong>]</strong>] 23:37, 27 July 2009 (UTC) *'''Delete''' Misplaced Pages is not news, as the nominator said. Furthermore, the Wikinews is vastly more informative, this really has nothing to add. <strong>]</strong>] 23:37, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
*Please before deciding, see ], many reliable sources have covered it, including the BBC. I however initially used the Register source since it was the first one I picked that mentioned Wikimedia Commons rather than just Misplaced Pages. <span style="border:1px solid #f57900;padding:1px;"><font style="color:#8f5902">]</font> ] </span> 23:38, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:38, 27 July 2009

National Portrait Gallery copyright conflicts

National Portrait Gallery copyright conflicts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable nor could it be established as notable based on searches for confirmation. Only one source provided discusses it, and it has very little reliability and is unprofessional (see: "bitchslap" in title). Misplaced Pages is not news, nor is it a collection of random poorly sourced information that speculates on possible legal events, especially from non-experts to provide reliable sources for said speculation. Ottava Rima (talk) 23:31, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete Misplaced Pages is not news, as the nominator said. Furthermore, the Wikinews article is vastly more informative, this really has nothing to add. Ray 23:37, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Please before deciding, see this, many reliable sources have covered it, including the BBC. I however initially used the Register source since it was the first one I picked that mentioned Wikimedia Commons rather than just Misplaced Pages. ViperSnake151  Talk  23:38, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Categories: