Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 21:15, 10 December 2005

Please do not remove references from articles. This is considered vandalism. Thank you. Alex Schenck (that's Linuxbeak to you) 01:51, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Misplaced Pages. It is considered vandalism, which, under Misplaced Pages policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Alex Schenck (that's Linuxbeak to you) 01:58, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

Alex Schenck (that's Linuxbeak to you) 03:44, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

December 2005

Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. --Nlu 01:04, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

My legitimate edits have been continually reverted by Linuxbeak and McNeight.....perhaps they are the problem?? If you truly read the discussions you will see that I am, perhaps, a bit obnoxious---but---they are able to close down my legitimate points without regard and that seems like dictatorial arrogance to me. I am shocked at their incredibly unprofessional words. I may be abrasive but one or both of them have used cuss words and been EXTREMELY unwilling to admit that the article has factual errors. I will not waste more time---but you should take a solid look at how many times they have reverted me. I am a nobody--a novice to Misplaced Pages--they are supposedly adults who just refuse to admit fault. Look at some of the responses to OTHER people besides me. I am disgusted by the whole matter.

Please see my response at Talk:Civil Air Patrol. --Nlu 09:06, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

Thank you all for shouting me down...no one shall question the great and powerful Oz!!

Wow--I guess I'm out numbered here. Let's make a deal--I won't visit the CAP article ever again and you look into my complaints against Linuxbeak and McNeight. They have made truly rude, personal comments about me and that is not acceptable.

05 December 2005

ALSO--since I am 68.112.201.90 and the name of this page is 68.112.201.90 I think that you are the one commiting vandalism.

If you continue to add a false name to my contributions I will file a formal complaint to whoever runs this operation. Perhaps you should consider the fact that on a public computer their may be SEVERAL different users.

My name is Major Roger Healey, CAP. You have insulted me and called me childish names. Please refrain from further personal attacks and illegal reverts!

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. --Nlu 23:28, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

Grant- Thank you for the NEW paragraph....finally an editor who is professional. Still--I have to wonder if McNeight calling me a 'loud-mouthed bully' is truly appropriate.

No, but neither were your comments. If either of you had gotten even more insulting or persistent I'd have blocked over that, too, but I have a fairly high toleration as far as insults are concerned. --Nlu 02:24, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

10 December 2005

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Alex Schenck (that's Linuxbeak to you) 20:37, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

You must be SO bored!! This page belongs to me---ya know--like you want to 'own' the CAP article---so please go away and play with yourself in your own sandbox!

You whine about my deletions--but then you delete my additions to MY page!? You must be really bored! DO NOT REMOVE MY COMMENTS!

"Go away boy, you bother me." W.C. Fields

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages. Alex Schenck (that's Linuxbeak to you) 20:50, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

PS: See Misplaced Pages:Sign_your_posts_on_talk_pages as well.

Ah--my own page---where I can be KING!! And poor little Alex has to come and vandalize, again and again......what a sad state of affairs this is.

So--why can you ADD your tagline to MY comments and call it vandalism when I restore them to the way I put them down?? I think you are the vandal!!

Signing the posts is considered a GUIDLINE--that means you can't FORCE me to do it!!

Quote from your source: This page is considered a guideline on Misplaced Pages. It illustrates standards of conduct, which many editors agree with in principle. However, it is not policy. Feel free to update the page as needed, but please use the discussion page to propose any major changes.

SO--you are the vandal when you add your taglines to MY posts!

...Have you even bothered to read the policies and guidelines of Misplaced Pages? Alex Schenck (that's Linuxbeak to you) 20:56, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

YES---it says GUIDLINE and NOT POLICY.....you are the vandal!! Quote from your source: This page is considered a guideline on Misplaced Pages. It illustrates standards of conduct, which many editors agree with in principle. However, it is not policy. Feel free to update the page as needed, but please use the discussion page to propose any major changes.

I DO NOT HAVE TO PUT A SIGNATURE ON MY COMMENTS---your additions are not wanted and NOT required by the policy!!

If you continue to VANDALIZE my page you will PROVE that you are a disgusting vandal!! UNSIGNED!

So--you are wrong and have vandalized MY page numerous times.....why are you such a dictatorial tyrant when it comes to a 'guidline' that is 'not policy' and shows your vandalism??

Come on--where the threats of blocking?? Perhaps your child-like attitude has been crushed by the FACT that you can not add you taglines to MY comments on MY page?! Do you want to block me because you are angry that you are wrong??

SO--since your 'warning' was a simple threat with NO basis in 'policy' I want you to removed it!! UNSIGNED!!

Wher are the clever quips now?? You are a bully who doesn't REALLY know what the facts are. I want my post to be UNSIGNED on my page----my way--not yours.

You have been blocked for disruption to Misplaced Pages. As you have proven to be disruptive in the past, an RFC is likely to be opened in regards to your behavior. If you wish to contest this ban, you may do so by using IRC. We are located at irc.freenode.net in the channel #wikipedia. Alex Schenck (that's Linuxbeak to you) 21:10, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

You are WRONG and yet you get to block me---what a sad little boy you truly are!!

MY PAGE--MY WAY---you can't dictate to me here!

WOW--I'm blocked and yet I can still add comments to my page......Alex must be wrong again!!

How can I be disruptive on my own page?? You are a vandal and you should go away!

Golly---I'm posting and leaving things unsigned and Alex is SO angry he has to make hollow threats. Sad.

Gee---maybe somebody out there KNOWS that Alex is wrong and tried to illegally block me from my own page?? Perhaps he had to go for a timeout??