Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 19:55, 2 September 2009 editHBC AIV helperbot5 (talk \| contribs)796,734 editsm 2 users left. rm Kingjoe811 (blocked by Beeblebrox (ACB)).← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:56, 2 September 2009 edit undoDBZfan29 (talk \| contribs)369 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 35:		Line 35:
	:: She's had me blocked twice. Resolving this personally is not an option. Remember, she removed my warning. Does it seem like she's going to try to resolve this issue? ] (]) 19:17, 2 September 2009 (UTC)		:: She's had me blocked twice. Resolving this personally is not an option. Remember, she removed my warning. Does it seem like she's going to try to resolve this issue? ] (]) 19:17, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
	:::That's as may be, but the fact that it's a content dispute removes it from the purview of AIV. ] <sup> ] </sup>~<small> ] </small> 19:43, 2 September 2009 (UTC)		:::That's as may be, but the fact that it's a content dispute removes it from the purview of AIV. ] <sup> ] </sup>~<small> ] </small> 19:43, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
			:::: If so, then why hasn't her report against me been given the tag? She's reporting me for the three-revert rule (when I have never reverted anything). An admin is friends with her and once said he would talk to me if this happened again and that he "had her back." If you can, please don't let administrator ] handle these reports because he might take sides with her. Don't take this as a personal attack; I just don't want him making any major decisions. ] (]) 19:56, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

	* {{Vandal\|Ghanshyamji}} 5 warnings but would not discuss even upon telling the user to discuss. The user is not too well established and was disrupting a GA article which eventually turned to vandalism '''Also''' an sockpuppet name for the user is ] Thanks ] ]] 19:30, 2 September 2009 (UTC)		* {{Vandal\|Ghanshyamji}} 5 warnings but would not discuss even upon telling the user to discuss. The user is not too well established and was disrupting a GA article which eventually turned to vandalism '''Also''' an sockpuppet name for the user is ] Thanks ] ]] 19:30, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
	::This IP goes with it- 59.94.132.188 ] ]] 19:37, 2 September 2009 (UTC)		::This IP goes with it- 59.94.132.188 ] ]] 19:37, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:56, 2 September 2009

v t e Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General	Administrators Main Incidents Bots Bureaucrats Centralized discussion Closure requests Education Interface admins Main Page errors Open proxies VRT Oversight User permissions
Articles, content	Biographies of living persons Copyrights Questions on media Problems Dispute resolution External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view Original research Pending changes Reliable sources Resource requests Scalable vector graphics Spam Blacklist Whitelist Style Titleblacklist Translation
Page handling	History merges Mergers Splits Moves Protection Importation XfD Articles Redirects Categories Templates Files Miscellany Undeletion
User conduct	Conflict of interest Contributor copyright Edit warring and 3RR Sanctions Personal restrictions General sanctions Contentious topics Sockpuppets Usernames (Requests for comment) Vandalism
Other	Arbitration Committee noticeboard Requests Enforcement Edit filters Requested False positives Questions Help desk Teahouse Reference desk New articles Requests for comment Village pump Policy Technical Proposals Idea lab WMF Miscellaneous WikiProject proposals Discussions for discussion
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards

Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here. Shortcut

WP:AIV

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

Important!

The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
If you decide that a report should be filed, place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
- * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.

This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This page was last updated at 01:45 on 21 January 2025 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.

Alerts

Bot-reported

Voidalt1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - United States Army was changed by Voidalt1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855202 on 2025-01-21T01:41:12+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 01:41, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

User-reported

Collectonian (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) I wrote this before but probably never hit save or it was removed. Anyway, I knew this would happen again. Collectonian and I were in an argument over a change a made on List of Dragon Ball GT episodes. She explained that unless I had sources, I couldn't make the edit, so I tried to make it so I could put it. She kept on reverting my change so I finally added sources that supported my edit. I never hit undo once but she keeps on doing it. I've listened to what the admins and her had to say. I stayed calm at all times. I didn't want it to come to this, but just has to. I put a warning up on her page but she removed it, so I have to do this. I'm probably going to be the one who gets punished since I always do but maybe I'm right this time! DBZfan29 (talk) 19:07, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Content dispute. Consider dispute resolution. -- Menti fisto 19:08, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

I second Mentifisto. I would also note that Collectonian is an established user, so it is likely that dispute resolution will have some effect. LessHeard vanU (talk) 19:11, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

She's had me blocked twice. Resolving this personally is not an option. Remember, she removed my warning. Does it seem like she's going to try to resolve this issue? DBZfan29 (talk) 19:17, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

That's as may be, but the fact that it's a content dispute removes it from the purview of AIV. UltraExactZZ ~ Evidence 19:43, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

If so, then why hasn't her report against me been given the tag? She's reporting me for the three-revert rule (when I have never reverted anything). An admin is friends with her and once said he would talk to me if this happened again and that he "had her back." If you can, please don't let administrator PMDrive1061 handle these reports because he might take sides with her. Don't take this as a personal attack; I just don't want him making any major decisions. DBZfan29 (talk) 19:56, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Ghanshyamji (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) 5 warnings but would not discuss even upon telling the user to discuss. The user is not too well established and was disrupting a GA article which eventually turned to vandalism Also an sockpuppet name for the user is User:Green akshardham Thanks Wo rld 19:30, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

This IP goes with it- 59.94.132.188 Wo rld 19:37, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Checking: but the sockpuppet part should be reported at WP:SPI. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:46, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Content dispute. Consider dispute resolution. You have both engaged in edit warring, but user seems to have calmed down now and is looking to discuss the matter on the talk page. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:53, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Categories: