| Revision as of 12:11, 6 September 2009 editRet.Prof (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers15,357 edits →The Herald (album): Keep← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:59, 6 September 2009 edit undoJuliancolton (talk | contribs)Administrators130,415 editsm Listing on WP:DELSORT under Albums and songsNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| *'''Do Not Delete''' I personally think the aricle should be left as it is for a while. I have heard of this before and think the article should be left in place. ] (]) 11:25, 6 September 2009 (UTC) | *'''Do Not Delete''' I personally think the aricle should be left as it is for a while. I have heard of this before and think the article should be left in place. ] (]) 11:25, 6 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' I agree with Boxcar - ] (]) 12:11, 6 September 2009 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' I agree with Boxcar - ] (]) 12:11, 6 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. <!--Template:Delsort--></small> <small>-- –''']''' | ] 12:59, 6 September 2009 (UTC)</small> | |||
Revision as of 12:59, 6 September 2009
The Herald (album)
- The Herald (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No ghits or google news results for this apparently highly controversial yet commercially successful album. No appearances in the music review sites that panned it so critically, the second worst reviewed album at metacritic is something called 'Hefty Fine by Bloodhound Gang' and not this album as claimed. Nothing to support the existence of this song, fails WP:V and is quite possibly an outright hoax and written as an attack on or to otherwise disparage Travis Barker. Benea (talk) 07:31, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. An obvious hoax. –Merqurial (talk) 07:58, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Hoax, possible speedy per G3. Pmlineditor Talk 09:31, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Article is factually accurate and representitive of the album recently released —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tlb1000 (talk • contribs) 11:21, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Do Not Delete I personally think the aricle should be left as it is for a while. I have heard of this before and think the article should be left in place. Boxcar90 (talk) 11:25, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with Boxcar - Ret.Prof (talk) 12:11, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | 12:59, 6 September 2009 (UTC)