Misplaced Pages

Talk:Indian Century: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:35, 10 September 2009 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,556,040 editsm Signing comment by LAKSJD1 - ""← Previous edit Revision as of 20:20, 26 July 2012 edit undoY not math (talk | contribs)59 edits →Indian Century: query re: article necessityNext edit →
Line 7: Line 7:


India is often called the next big superpower it has a thriving economy, third largest military, large land area, large population, nukes, stable and democratic government etc. LAKSJD1 21:33, 10 September 2009 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> India is often called the next big superpower it has a thriving economy, third largest military, large land area, large population, nukes, stable and democratic government etc. LAKSJD1 21:33, 10 September 2009 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Do we really need a neologism for a possibility? In fact, does it make sense to create an encyclopedia article on a personal/non-scientific hypothesis? If it was a movement, or an ideology, it might have made sense to document it, but this is not that either. I'm pretty sure the British and American centuries were named in hindsight, not as a prophecies. ] (]) 20:20, 26 July 2012 (UTC)] (]

Revision as of 20:20, 26 July 2012

WikiProject iconIndia Stub‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Indian Century article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1


Indian Century

Indian century is as common a term as Chinese century is so why some users r objecting against making this pageLAKSJD1 21:29, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

India is often called the next big superpower it has a thriving economy, third largest military, large land area, large population, nukes, stable and democratic government etc. LAKSJD1 21:33, 10 September 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by LAKSJD1 (talk • contribs)

Do we really need a neologism for a possibility? In fact, does it make sense to create an encyclopedia article on a personal/non-scientific hypothesis? If it was a movement, or an ideology, it might have made sense to document it, but this is not that either. I'm pretty sure the British and American centuries were named in hindsight, not as a prophecies. Y not math (talk) 20:20, 26 July 2012 (UTC)Y_not_math (talk

Categories: