| Revision as of 23:05, 15 December 2005 edit68.251.158.126 (talk) →three revert rule← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:51, 15 December 2005 edit undoDan100 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users29,093 edits You must...Next edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| ] 23:05, 15 December 2005 (UTC) | ] 23:05, 15 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
| == You must... == | |||
| ...]! It's as simple as that - you need to be able to show where you're getting the information from, especially when you're making such wide-ranging changes to an article. You ''have'' to be able to cite sources, or the changes get reversed! ] (]) 23:51, 15 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:51, 15 December 2005
Please explain your edits of Alkyl nitrites on Talk:Alkyl nitrites. As it stands, they stand unreferenced and unexplained. Thank you. --Nlu (talk) 04:08, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Please, would you explain your edits of Alkyhl nitrites
In the interest of a neutral and accurate Misplaced Pages, would you explain your own edits of Alkyl nitrites on Talk:Alkyl nitrites. As it is, yours stand unreferenced and unexplained.
three revert rule
hi-
as per the three revert rule, no editor should revert an article in part or whole more than three times in 24 hours, or your account may be blocked. you are approaching this limit. thank you. --Heah 22:43, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks. It's odd, but every time I edit the page, within minutes someone reverts it back. I suspect it's the same person each time. Have you informed them of the the three revert rule as well? They are clearly in violation.
68.251.158.126 23:05, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
You must...
...cite sources! It's as simple as that - you need to be able to show where you're getting the information from, especially when you're making such wide-ranging changes to an article. You have to be able to cite sources, or the changes get reversed! Dan100 (Talk) 23:51, 15 December 2005 (UTC)