| Revision as of 05:43, 17 December 2005 editAkamad (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers8,218 edits rv back to 05:38, December 17, 2005 due to changing of dates← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:47, 17 December 2005 edit undoAkamad (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers8,218 edits WP:3RR ruleNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Unblock me please, I have just as much a right to edit as anyone else, besides the person who blocked me was obviously trying to cover up '''their''' violation of the ] rule , , and do even need to go on? clear inpropriaty, unblock--] 05:31, 17 December 2005 (UTC) | Unblock me please, I have just as much a right to edit as anyone else, besides the person who blocked me was obviously trying to cover up '''their''' violation of the ] rule , , and do even need to go on? clear inpropriaty, unblock--] 05:31, 17 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :The three reverts that you linked to were perfomed on more than one article, thus it doesn't breach the ] rule. Plus the rule states ''more'' than 3 reverts. - ] 05:47, 17 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:47, 17 December 2005
Unblock me please, I have just as much a right to edit as anyone else, besides the person who blocked me was obviously trying to cover up their violation of the WP:3RR rule here, here, and here do even need to go on? clear inpropriaty, unblock--Piedras grandes 05:31, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
- The three reverts that you linked to were perfomed on more than one article, thus it doesn't breach the WP:3RR rule. Plus the rule states more than 3 reverts. - Akamad 05:47, 17 December 2005 (UTC)