Misplaced Pages

Digital philosophy: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:06, 21 December 2005 edit202.36.179.65 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 19:07, 21 December 2005 edit undo202.36.179.65 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
'''Digital philosophy''' is a new direction in ] and ] advocated by certain mathematicians and theoretical physicists, e.g., ], ], ], and ]. It is, in essence, a modern re-interpretation of ]'s ] ] that replaces Leibniz's monads with aspects of the theory of ]. More specifically, ] conjectures that the universe is a gigantic ] ]. '''Digital philosophy''' is a new direction in ] and ] advocated by certain mathematicians and theoretical physicists, e.g., ], ], ], and ]. It is, in essence, a modern re-interpretation of ]'s ] ] that replaces Leibniz's monads with aspects of the theory of ]. More specifically, ] conjectures that the universe is a gigantic ] ].


Digital philosophy purports to solve certain hard problems in the ] and the ], since, following Leibniz, the mind can be given a ]al treatment. The digital approach also dispenses with the non-deterministic essentialism of the ] of ]. In a digital universe, existence and thought would be equivalent to computation. Thus computation is the single substance of a ] metaphysics, while subjectivity arises from computational ]. This approach to metaphysics has been dubbed "multism" since it posits the existence of multiple universes. Digital philosophy purports to solve certain hard problems in the ] and the ], since, following Leibniz, the mind can be given a ]al treatment. The digital approach also dispenses with the non-deterministic essentialism of the ] of ]. In a digital universe, existence and thought would be equivalent to computation. Thus computation is the single substance of a ] metaphysics, while subjectivity arises from computational ]. This approach to ] has been dubbed "multism" since it posits the existence of multiple universes.


Newsgroup: sci.physics.discrete. Newsgroup: sci.physics.discrete.

Revision as of 19:07, 21 December 2005

You must add a |reason= parameter to this Cleanup template – replace it with {{Cleanup|November 2005|reason=<Fill reason here>}}, or remove the Cleanup template.

Digital philosophy is a new direction in philosophy and cosmology advocated by certain mathematicians and theoretical physicists, e.g., Gregory Chaitin, Edward Fredkin, Stephen Wolfram, and Konrad Zuse. It is, in essence, a modern re-interpretation of Leibniz's monist metaphysics that replaces Leibniz's monads with aspects of the theory of Cellular automata. More specifically, digital physics conjectures that the universe is a gigantic Turing-complete cellular automata.

Digital philosophy purports to solve certain hard problems in the philosophy of mind and the philosophy of physics, since, following Leibniz, the mind can be given a computational treatment. The digital approach also dispenses with the non-deterministic essentialism of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum theory. In a digital universe, existence and thought would be equivalent to computation. Thus computation is the single substance of a monist metaphysics, while subjectivity arises from computational universality. This approach to metaphysics has been dubbed "multism" since it posits the existence of multiple universes.

Newsgroup: sci.physics.discrete. Mailing lists on yahoogroups.com: digitalphilosophy, digitalphysics.

See also

External links

Fredkin's digital philosophy page