| Revision as of 01:31, 3 November 2009 editRjanag (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users58,857 edits done← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:53, 3 November 2009 edit undoJayen466 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Mass message senders, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers56,627 edits →Not One Less: cmtNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| * Is there any way you can integrate the "See also"s into the article? —] (]) 00:56, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | * Is there any way you can integrate the "See also"s into the article? —] (]) 00:56, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
| **. <b class="Unicode">]</b> <small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 01:31, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | **. <b class="Unicode">]</b> <small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 01:31, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Comment''' This looks generally very good. | |||
| *#In one passage we refer to "another student (Zhang Mingshan)"; I couldn't find that name listed in the cast. Is it because it is a minor character? --'''<font color="#0000FF">]</font><font color=" #FFBF00">]</font>''' 01:53, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:53, 3 November 2009
Not One Less
- Nominator(s): rʨanaɢ /contribs 02:31, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
| Toolbox |
|---|
This article—about a fascinating, strange, and controversial film—has been carefully researched and been through a couple copyedits. I feel it meets all the FA criteria. rʨanaɢ /contribs 02:31, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- Image copyright review: All OK. Stifle (talk) 09:47, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Comment The toolbox reveals a dead link. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:55, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- I saw that too, but when you actually try the link it's fine. This is not the first time I've noticed the toolbox incorrectly marking links as dead; I don't know how exactly that tool works, so I'm not sure would could be causing it. rʨanaɢ /contribs 23:16, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- I know that when I clicked on it the first time it was dead. However, it seems to have fixed itself. Sorry for the false alarm. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:15, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
- Comments - sources look okay, links checked out with the link checker tool. Ealdgyth - Talk 17:24, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- Comments Very interesting article. The quotations in this sentence are not directly referenced: Zhang accused the festival of not being motivated by artistic concerns, and criticized the Western perception that all Chinese films must be either "pro-government" or "anti-government", referring to it as a "discrimination against Chinese films". —mattisse (Talk) 22:20, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for catching that. I've moved the ref to the end of the sentence to make it clearer that all the quotes are from there. rʨanaɢ /contribs 23:30, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- Is there any way you can integrate the "See also"s into the article? —mattisse (Talk) 00:56, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
- Comment This looks generally very good.
- In one passage we refer to "another student (Zhang Mingshan)"; I couldn't find that name listed in the cast. Is it because it is a minor character? --JN466 01:53, 3 November 2009 (UTC)