Revision as of 23:50, 6 November 2009 editBando26 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers4,084 edits wikilinking Hal Bidlack← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:53, 6 November 2009 edit undoBando26 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers4,084 edits Fixing link. (I highlighted Hal Bidlack and told it to Wikilink; instead, I don't know what it did!)Next edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Cleanup|date=November 2009}} | {{Cleanup|date=November 2009}} | ||
The '''ADE 651''' is an expensive device widely used by Iraqi police, produced by ATSC (UK) , that claims to be effective at detecting the presence and perhaps location of explosives.<ref></ref> Many skeptics doubt its effectiveness, including ], who is offering US$1 million to anyone who can prove its effectiveness,<ref></ref> and retired ]] Lt. Col. Hal Bidlack<ref>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/04/world/middleeast/04sensors.html?_r=1&ref=world Iraq Swears by Bomb Detector U.S. Sees as Useless]</ref>. | The '''ADE 651''' is an expensive device widely used by Iraqi police, produced by ATSC (UK) , that claims to be effective at detecting the presence and perhaps location of explosives.<ref></ref> Many skeptics doubt its effectiveness, including ], who is offering US$1 million to anyone who can prove its effectiveness,<ref></ref> and retired ] Lt. Col. ]<ref>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/04/world/middleeast/04sensors.html?_r=1&ref=world Iraq Swears by Bomb Detector U.S. Sees as Useless]</ref>. | ||
It is claimed that the ADE 651 failed to prevent many of the bombings in Iraq. | It is claimed that the ADE 651 failed to prevent many of the bombings in Iraq. |
Revision as of 23:53, 6 November 2009
This article may require cleanup to meet Misplaced Pages's quality standards. No cleanup reason has been specified. Please help improve this article if you can. (November 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
The ADE 651 is an expensive device widely used by Iraqi police, produced by ATSC (UK) , that claims to be effective at detecting the presence and perhaps location of explosives. Many skeptics doubt its effectiveness, including James Randi, who is offering US$1 million to anyone who can prove its effectiveness, and retired USAF Lt. Col. Hal Bidlack.
It is claimed that the ADE 651 failed to prevent many of the bombings in Iraq.
Dowsing rod type explosive detectors
ADE 651 is one of a few devices that are derided as being high tech dowsing rods because of their appearance and lack of proven efficacy. Others include Sniffex and ek-9 GT200.
Testing by Labratories
Sandia National Laboratories tested a similar device, the MOLE Programmable System manufactured by Global Technical Ltd. of Kent, UK, and found it inefficacious.
Other product names and numbers believed to be similar dowsing type devices to the ADE 651
ADE 100, ADE 101, ADE650, ADE 651, ADE 750, ADE 751
References
- Iraq Swears by Bomb Detector U.S. Sees as Useless
- A Direct, Specific, Challenge From James Randi and the JREF
- http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/04/world/middleeast/04sensors.html?_r=1&ref=world Iraq Swears by Bomb Detector U.S. Sees as Useless]
- Double-Blind Field Evaluation of the MOLE Programmable Detection System, Sandia National Laboratories
See Also:
- SNIFFEX, another similar device.
- Dowsing rod, general class of historic devices
External Links
- ATSC corporate website
- e-k9 maker of the gf200
- Blog: Questions About Sniffex, ADE651, GT200 and Other Explosive Detectors