| Revision as of 02:32, 8 November 2009 editCaptain Occam (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,011 edits →A proposal for the Race and intelligence article← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:25, 9 November 2009 edit undoEphery (talk | contribs)2,524 edits clean upNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Race and intelligence == | |||
| I just wanted to let you know that I appreciate your involvement in this article, as well as your participation on its discussion page. Several of the people working on the article just seem interested in pushing their own point of view about it, but thus far you’ve been a lot more reasonable, and having more people like you involved in it helps counteract this problem. I hope you’ll continue to contribute to the current discussions about how the article should be restructured. --] (]) 13:27, 18 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == 3RR == | |||
| {{3RR|Race and genetics}}--] (]) 15:51, 23 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == A proposal for the ] article == | |||
| I’m posting this comment on several users’ talk pages, because I’d like all of you to give me your input about a large change I’m considering making to the race and intelligence article. In my opinion, the article in its current state has a lot of issues. Fixing them has also proven to be next to impossible, partly because new changes have been made more quickly than it’s been possible to build consensus to undo changes that had been made previously. | |||
| I’m also of the opinion that the article as it existed was considerably more informative, more balanced, and better-written than its current version. What I’m proposing is that rather than continuing to try and improve the article one part at a time, I would like to revert the article to the state that it had in 2006, while updating the things that need to be updated after three years. | |||
| The current discussion about this has been on my user talk page, towards the bottom of it. I would appreciate any of you reading the discussion about this idea, and letting me know there what you think of it. I’d like to be supported by the consensus of as many editors as possible before I attempt this. --] (]) 15:15, 24 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :I’ve just brought up this idea on the Race and intelligence discussion page ], so I would appreciate having your feedback about it there. --] (]) 02:32, 8 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Race and genetics at AN/I == | |||
| Since you’ve been involved in this article recently, I thought you might be interested to participate in ]. The topic being discussed there is whether the user Muntuwandi has been violating the conditions under which he was unbanned from Misplaced Pages a few months ago. (1RR and no disruptive behavior.) Your input there would be appreciated. --] (]) 01:06, 3 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Major content removal == | |||
| You are making some major edits at the ] article, I would think that asking on the talk b4 major removal of conntent to check if there is consensus for your removal is a good idea. ] (]) 21:38, 4 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :OK, but that is not much of a consensus for what is turning out the be a major rewrite with major removals, its just a suggestion to take it easy and to get feedback as you go along, the article is quite contensious. With quite a few involved editors. ] (]) 21:44, 4 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Agreed. ] (]) 21:59, 4 November 2009 (UTC) | |||