| Revision as of 02:14, 25 November 2009 editDaedalus969 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,809 edits Creating deletion discussion page for Kosvinsky Mountain. (TW) | Revision as of 02:48, 25 November 2009 edit undoAntandrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators111,294 edits →Kosvinsky Mountain: keep, obvious, with rationaleNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| :({{findsources|Kosvinsky Mountain}}) | :({{findsources|Kosvinsky Mountain}}) | ||
| Non-notable mountain. ] states, if a subject has ''received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject'', it is notable. However, all I see here is a single newspaper source(not significant by far), and a bunch of cites to a single dictionary. — ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 02:14, 25 November 2009 (UTC) | Non-notable mountain. ] states, if a subject has ''received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject'', it is notable. However, all I see here is a single newspaper source(not significant by far), and a bunch of cites to a single dictionary. — ''']]<sup> ]</sup>''' 02:14, 25 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''', of course; quite notable as one of the two super-hardened facilities constructed in the Urals by Russia after the Cold War. There are plenty more references if you dig, and the Russian language references are also valid. from 2003, for example. By the way, we have plenty of articles on similarly topographically distinct mountain peaks in the U.S. that have no bunkers inside. ] ] 02:48, 25 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:48, 25 November 2009
Kosvinsky Mountain
AfDs for this article:- Kosvinsky Mountain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable mountain. WP:GNG states, if a subject has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is notable. However, all I see here is a single newspaper source(not significant by far), and a bunch of cites to a single dictionary. — Dædαlus 02:14, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- Keep, of course; quite notable as one of the two super-hardened facilities constructed in the Urals by Russia after the Cold War. There are plenty more references if you dig, and the Russian language references are also valid. Here is one from the Washington Post from 2003, for example. By the way, we have plenty of articles on similarly topographically distinct mountain peaks in the U.S. that have no bunkers inside. Antandrus (talk) 02:48, 25 November 2009 (UTC)