Misplaced Pages

User talk:Valjean: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:50, 29 December 2005 editValjean (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers95,334 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 06:50, 29 December 2005 edit undoValjean (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers95,334 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
Your latest edit to the Alternative medicine page appears to be a copy/paste, and maybe a copyvio. I've reverted it, could you perhaps write up a summary, and reference to the study itstead? ] 16:31, 28 December 2005 (UTC) Your latest edit to the Alternative medicine page appears to be a copy/paste, and maybe a copyvio. I've reverted it, could you perhaps write up a summary, and reference to the study itstead? ] 16:31, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
:Looks much more consistent with the rest of the page now. :-) ] 23:50, 28 December 2005 (UTC) :Looks much more consistent with the rest of the page now. :-) ] 23:50, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
::Thanks! I'm still learning and appreciate the helpful suggestions. Now I need help with the ] section about "Problems with the label "alternative"". It's far too shallow and needs supporting arguments, but AED doesn't seem to think so. -- ] 06:46, 29 December 2005 (UTC) ::Thanks! I'm still learning and appreciate the helpful suggestions. Now I need help with the ] section about "Problems with the label "alternative"". It's far too shallow and needs supporting arguments, but AED doesn't seem to think so. -- ] 06:46, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:50, 29 December 2005

Your latest edit to the Alternative medicine page appears to be a copy/paste, and maybe a copyvio. I've reverted it, could you perhaps write up a summary, and reference to the study itstead? Ronabop 16:31, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Looks much more consistent with the rest of the page now. :-) Ronabop 23:50, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks! I'm still learning and appreciate the helpful suggestions. Now I need help with the Alternative medicine section about "Problems with the label "alternative"". It's far too shallow and needs supporting arguments, but AED doesn't seem to think so. -- Fyslee 06:46, 29 December 2005 (UTC)