Revision as of 06:50, 29 December 2005 editValjean (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers95,334 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:50, 29 December 2005 edit undoValjean (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers95,334 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Your latest edit to the Alternative medicine page appears to be a copy/paste, and maybe a copyvio. I've reverted it, could you perhaps write up a summary, and reference to the study itstead? ] 16:31, 28 December 2005 (UTC) | Your latest edit to the Alternative medicine page appears to be a copy/paste, and maybe a copyvio. I've reverted it, could you perhaps write up a summary, and reference to the study itstead? ] 16:31, 28 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
:Looks much more consistent with the rest of the page now. :-) ] 23:50, 28 December 2005 (UTC) | :Looks much more consistent with the rest of the page now. :-) ] 23:50, 28 December 2005 (UTC) | ||
::Thanks! I'm still learning and appreciate the helpful suggestions. Now I need help with the ] section about "Problems with the label "alternative"". It's far too shallow and needs supporting arguments, but AED doesn't seem to think so. -- ] 06:46, 29 December 2005 (UTC) | ::Thanks! I'm still learning and appreciate the helpful suggestions. Now I need help with the ] section about "Problems with the label "alternative"". It's far too shallow and needs supporting arguments, but AED doesn't seem to think so. -- ] 06:46, 29 December 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:50, 29 December 2005
Your latest edit to the Alternative medicine page appears to be a copy/paste, and maybe a copyvio. I've reverted it, could you perhaps write up a summary, and reference to the study itstead? Ronabop 16:31, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Looks much more consistent with the rest of the page now. :-) Ronabop 23:50, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'm still learning and appreciate the helpful suggestions. Now I need help with the Alternative medicine section about "Problems with the label "alternative"". It's far too shallow and needs supporting arguments, but AED doesn't seem to think so. -- Fyslee 06:46, 29 December 2005 (UTC)