Misplaced Pages

Scientism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:23, 14 December 2009 edit99.2.157.202 (talk) →Overview← Previous edit Revision as of 02:39, 16 December 2009 edit undoSmackBot (talk | contribs)3,734,324 editsm Date maintenance tags and general fixesNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{for|the concept in the Foundation series|Scientism (Foundation)}} {{For|the concept in the Foundation series|Scientism (Foundation)}}
The term '''scientism''' is used to describe the view that ] has authority over all other interpretations of life, such as ], ], ], ], or ] explanations, and over other fields of inquiry, such as the ]. The term is used by social scientists like ]<ref>Hayek in "The Counter Revolution Of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason", Publisher: Liberty Fund Inc. (June 1, 1980), ISBN 0913966665 </ref> or ] to describe what they see as the underlying attitudes and beliefs common to many scientists. They tend to use the term in either of two equally ]<ref>Scientism: "''an exaggerated trust in the efficacy of the methods of natural science applied to all areas of investigation (as in philosophy, the social sciences, and the humanities)''" definition from: Ryder, Martin. "Scientism." ''Encyclopedia of Science Technology and Ethics''. 3rd ed. Detroit: MacMillan Reference Books, 2005.</ref><ref name="ODP">Scientism: "Pejorative term for the belief that the methods of natural science, or the categories and things recognized in natural science, form the only proper elements in any philosophical or other inquiry. The classic statement of scientism is the physicist ] saying 'there is physics and there is stamp-collecting.'", definition from '']''. n.d.</ref> directions: The term '''scientism''' is used to describe the view that ] has authority over all other interpretations of life, such as ], ], ], ], or ] explanations, and over other fields of inquiry, such as the ]. The term is used by social scientists like ]<ref>Hayek in "The Counter Revolution Of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason", Publisher: Liberty Fund Inc. (June 1, 1980), ISBN 0913966665</ref> or ] to describe what they see as the underlying attitudes and beliefs common to many scientists. They tend to use the term in either of two equally ]<ref>Scientism: "''an exaggerated trust in the efficacy of the methods of natural science applied to all areas of investigation (as in philosophy, the social sciences, and the humanities)''" definition from: Ryder, Martin. "Scientism." ''Encyclopedia of Science Technology and Ethics''. 3rd ed. Detroit: MacMillan Reference Books, 2005.</ref><ref name="ODP">Scientism: "Pejorative term for the belief that the methods of natural science, or the categories and things recognized in natural science, form the only proper elements in any philosophical or other inquiry. The classic statement of scientism is the physicist ] saying 'there is physics and there is stamp-collecting.'", definition from '']''. n.d.</ref> directions:


#To indicate the improper usage of ] or scientific claims<ref>After reviewing the usage of the term by contemporary scholars, Gregory R Peterson concludes that "''the best way to understand the charge of scientism is as a kind of logical fallacy involving improper usage of science or scientific claims.''" (p.753). From: "] (2003) Demarcation and the Scientistic Fallacy. '']'' '''38''' (4), 751-761. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2003.00536.x"</ref> as a counter-argument to ] in contexts where science might not apply,<ref> by Martin Ryder - University of Colorado. (Accessed: July 05 2007)</ref> such as when the topic is perceived to be beyond the scope of ]. #To indicate the improper usage of ] or scientific claims<ref>After reviewing the usage of the term by contemporary scholars, Gregory R Peterson concludes that "''the best way to understand the charge of scientism is as a kind of logical fallacy involving improper usage of science or scientific claims.''" (p.753). From: "] (2003) Demarcation and the Scientistic Fallacy. '']'' '''38''' (4), 751-761. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2003.00536.x"</ref> as a counter-argument to ] in contexts where science might not apply,<ref> by Martin Ryder - University of Colorado. (Accessed: July 05 2007)</ref> such as when the topic is perceived to be beyond the scope of ].
Line 11: Line 11:
# It is used to denote a border-crossing violation in which the theories and methods of one (scientific) discipline are inappropriately applied to another (scientific or non-scientific) discipline and its domain. An example of this second usage is to label as scientism any attempt to claim science as the only or primary source of human values (a traditional domain of ]) or as the source of ] and ] (a traditional domain of ] and related ]). # It is used to denote a border-crossing violation in which the theories and methods of one (scientific) discipline are inappropriately applied to another (scientific or non-scientific) discipline and its domain. An example of this second usage is to label as scientism any attempt to claim science as the only or primary source of human values (a traditional domain of ]) or as the source of ] and ] (a traditional domain of ] and related ]).


According to ] in the ''Encyclopedia of science and religion'',<ref name="expansionism">As described by Mikael Stenmark, author of the article about the topic of Scientism in: J. Wentzel Vrede van Huyssteen (editor). Encyclopedia of science and religion, 2nd ed. Thomson Gale. 2003. (p.783)</ref> while the ]s that are described as scientism have many possible forms and varying degrees of ambition, they share the idea that the boundaries of science (that is, typically the natural sciences) could and should be expanded so that something that has not been previously considered as a subject pertinent to science can now be understood as part of science (usually with science becoming the sole or the main arbiter regarding this area or dimension). In its most extreme form, scientism is the ] that science has no boundaries, that in due time all human problems and all aspects of human endeavor will be dealt and solved by science ''alone.'' {{fact}} This idea is also called the ].<ref>G. Monastra, M. M. Zarandi, Science and the Myth of Progress, 2004.</ref> Stenmark proposes the expression ''scientific expansionism'' as a synonym of scientism. ] critiqued this form of scientism as an impoverished world view that not only leaves unanswered, but denies the validity of all questions of fundamental importance to human existence.<ref>E. F. Schumacher, ''Guide for the Perplexed'', ISBN 0060906111, p. 4</ref> According to ] in the ''Encyclopedia of science and religion'',<ref name="expansionism">As described by Mikael Stenmark, author of the article about the topic of Scientism in: J. Wentzel Vrede van Huyssteen (editor). Encyclopedia of science and religion, 2nd ed. Thomson Gale. 2003. (p.783)</ref> while the ]s that are described as scientism have many possible forms and varying degrees of ambition, they share the idea that the boundaries of science (that is, typically the natural sciences) could and should be expanded so that something that has not been previously considered as a subject pertinent to science can now be understood as part of science (usually with science becoming the sole or the main arbiter regarding this area or dimension). In its most extreme form, scientism is the ] that science has no boundaries, that in due time all human problems and all aspects of human endeavor will be dealt and solved by science ''alone.'' {{Citation needed|date=December 2009}} This idea is also called the ].<ref>G. Monastra, M. M. Zarandi, Science and the Myth of Progress, 2004.</ref> Stenmark proposes the expression ''scientific expansionism'' as a synonym of scientism. ] critiqued this form of scientism as an impoverished world view that not only leaves unanswered, but denies the validity of all questions of fundamental importance to human existence.<ref>E. F. Schumacher, ''Guide for the Perplexed'', ISBN 0060906111, p. 4</ref>


==Relevance to the science and religion debate== ==Relevance to the science and religion debate==
Line 20: Line 20:
Standard dictionary definitions include the following applications of the term "scientism": Standard dictionary definitions include the following applications of the term "scientism":
*The use of the style, assumptions, techniques, and other attributes typically displayed by scientists.<ref>''Random House Dictionary of the English Language.'' 1987.</ref> *The use of the style, assumptions, techniques, and other attributes typically displayed by scientists.<ref>''Random House Dictionary of the English Language.'' 1987.</ref>
*Methods and attitudes typical of or attributed to the natural scientist.<ref>''Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary.'' 1983. Cf. "Scientism" definition 1, '' Oxford English Dictionary'' web edition, accessed October 16, 2009 </ref> *Methods and attitudes typical of or attributed to the natural scientist.<ref>''Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary.'' 1983. Cf. "Scientism" definition 1, '' Oxford English Dictionary'' web edition, accessed October 16, 2009</ref>
*An exaggerated ] in the efficacy of the ]s of natural science applied to all areas of investigation, as in philosophy, the social sciences, and the humanities.<ref>Webster. 1983.</ref> *An exaggerated ] in the efficacy of the ]s of natural science applied to all areas of investigation, as in philosophy, the social sciences, and the humanities.<ref>Webster. 1983.</ref>
*The use of scientific or pseudoscientific language.<ref>Webster. 1983. Definition #3 for Scientism.</ref> *The use of scientific or pseudoscientific language.<ref>Webster. 1983. Definition #3 for Scientism.</ref>
* The contention that the ], such as economics and sociology, are only properly sciences when they abide by the somewhat stricter interpretation of ] used by the ], and that otherwise they are not truly sciences.<ref>Webster. 1983. Definition #2 for Scientism.</ref> * The contention that the ], such as economics and sociology, are only properly sciences when they abide by the somewhat stricter interpretation of ] used by the ], and that otherwise they are not truly sciences.<ref>Webster. 1983. Definition #2 for Scientism.</ref>
*"A term applied (freq. in a derogatory manner) to a belief in the omnipotence of scientific knowledge and techniques; also to the view that the methods of study appropriate to physical science can replace those used in other fields such as philosophy and, esp., human behaviour and the social sciences." <ref>"Scientism" definition 2, '' Oxford English Dictionary'' web edition, accessed October 16, 2009</ref> *"A term applied (freq. in a derogatory manner) to a belief in the omnipotence of scientific knowledge and techniques; also to the view that the methods of study appropriate to physical science can replace those used in other fields such as philosophy and, esp., human behaviour and the social sciences." <ref>"Scientism" definition 2, '' Oxford English Dictionary'' web edition, accessed October 16, 2009</ref>
*The belief that scientific knowledge is the foundation of all knowledge and that, consequently, scientific argument should always be weighted more heavily than other forms of knowledge, particularly those which are not yet well described or justified from within the rational framework, or whose description fails to present itself in the course of a debate against a scientific argument. It can be contrasted by doctrines like ], which hold that there are certain "unknowable" truths.<ref> The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition. 2000. </ref>{{Failed verification|date=June 2009}} *The belief that scientific knowledge is the foundation of all knowledge and that, consequently, scientific argument should always be weighted more heavily than other forms of knowledge, particularly those which are not yet well described or justified from within the rational framework, or whose description fails to present itself in the course of a debate against a scientific argument. It can be contrasted by doctrines like ], which hold that there are certain "unknowable" truths.<ref> The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition. 2000. </ref>{{Failed verification|date=June 2009}}
* As a form of ]: "In essence, ''scientism'' sees science as the absolute and only justifiable access to the truth."<ref>. ''Faith and Reason.''</ref> * As a form of ]: "In essence, ''scientism'' sees science as the absolute and only justifiable access to the truth."<ref>. ''Faith and Reason.''</ref>


Line 51: Line 51:
* ] * ]
{{Div col end}} {{Div col end}}




==References== ==References==
{{reflist|2}} {{reflist|2}}



{{philosophy of science}} {{philosophy of science}}

Revision as of 02:39, 16 December 2009

For the concept in the Foundation series, see Scientism (Foundation).

The term scientism is used to describe the view that natural science has authority over all other interpretations of life, such as philosophical, religious, mythical, spiritual, or humanistic explanations, and over other fields of inquiry, such as the social sciences. The term is used by social scientists like Hayek or Karl Popper to describe what they see as the underlying attitudes and beliefs common to many scientists. They tend to use the term in either of two equally pejorative directions:

  1. To indicate the improper usage of science or scientific claims as a counter-argument to appeals to scientific authority in contexts where science might not apply, such as when the topic is perceived to be beyond the scope of scientific inquiry.
  2. To refer to "the belief that the methods of natural science, or the categories and things recognized in natural science, form the only proper elements in any philosophical or other inquiry," with a concomitant "elimination of the psychological dimensions of experience". It thus expresses a position critical of (at least the more extreme expressions of) positivism.

Overview

Reviewing the references to scientism in the works of contemporary scholars, Gregory R. Peterson detects two main broad themes:

  1. It is used to criticize a totalizing view of science as if it were capable of describing all reality and knowledge, or as if it were the only true way to acquire knowledge about reality and the nature of things;
  2. It is used to denote a border-crossing violation in which the theories and methods of one (scientific) discipline are inappropriately applied to another (scientific or non-scientific) discipline and its domain. An example of this second usage is to label as scientism any attempt to claim science as the only or primary source of human values (a traditional domain of ethics) or as the source of meaning and purpose (a traditional domain of religion and related worldviews).

According to Mikael Stenmark in the Encyclopedia of science and religion, while the doctrines that are described as scientism have many possible forms and varying degrees of ambition, they share the idea that the boundaries of science (that is, typically the natural sciences) could and should be expanded so that something that has not been previously considered as a subject pertinent to science can now be understood as part of science (usually with science becoming the sole or the main arbiter regarding this area or dimension). In its most extreme form, scientism is the faith that science has no boundaries, that in due time all human problems and all aspects of human endeavor will be dealt and solved by science alone. This idea is also called the Myth of Progress. Stenmark proposes the expression scientific expansionism as a synonym of scientism. E. F. Schumacher critiqued this form of scientism as an impoverished world view that not only leaves unanswered, but denies the validity of all questions of fundamental importance to human existence.

Relevance to the science and religion debate

Gregory R. Peterson remarks that "for many theologians and philosophers, scientism is among the greatest of intellectual sins". In fact, today the term is often used against vocal critics of religion-as-such. For instance, the philosopher of science Daniel Dennett responded to criticism of his book Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon by saying that "when someone puts forward a scientific theory that really don't like, they just try to discredit it as 'scientism'". Meanwhile, in an essay that emphasizes parallels between scientism and traditional religious movements, The Skeptics Society founder Michael Shermer self-identifies as "scientistic" and defines the term as "a scientific worldview that encompasses natural explanations for all phenomena, eschews supernatural and paranormal speculations, and embraces empiricism and reason as the twin pillars of a philosophy of life appropriate for an Age of Science." Psychologist and parapsychologist Charles Tart has described scientism as being, from a psychological point of view, a form of belief.

Range of meanings

Standard dictionary definitions include the following applications of the term "scientism":

  • The use of the style, assumptions, techniques, and other attributes typically displayed by scientists.
  • Methods and attitudes typical of or attributed to the natural scientist.
  • An exaggerated trust in the efficacy of the methods of natural science applied to all areas of investigation, as in philosophy, the social sciences, and the humanities.
  • The use of scientific or pseudoscientific language.
  • The contention that the social sciences, such as economics and sociology, are only properly sciences when they abide by the somewhat stricter interpretation of scientific method used by the natural sciences, and that otherwise they are not truly sciences.
  • "A term applied (freq. in a derogatory manner) to a belief in the omnipotence of scientific knowledge and techniques; also to the view that the methods of study appropriate to physical science can replace those used in other fields such as philosophy and, esp., human behaviour and the social sciences."
  • The belief that scientific knowledge is the foundation of all knowledge and that, consequently, scientific argument should always be weighted more heavily than other forms of knowledge, particularly those which are not yet well described or justified from within the rational framework, or whose description fails to present itself in the course of a debate against a scientific argument. It can be contrasted by doctrines like historicism, which hold that there are certain "unknowable" truths.
  • As a form of dogma: "In essence, scientism sees science as the absolute and only justifiable access to the truth."

See also

References

  1. Hayek in "The Counter Revolution Of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason", Publisher: Liberty Fund Inc. (June 1, 1980), ISBN 0913966665
  2. Scientism: "an exaggerated trust in the efficacy of the methods of natural science applied to all areas of investigation (as in philosophy, the social sciences, and the humanities)" definition from: Ryder, Martin. "Scientism." Encyclopedia of Science Technology and Ethics. 3rd ed. Detroit: MacMillan Reference Books, 2005.
  3. ^ Scientism: "Pejorative term for the belief that the methods of natural science, or the categories and things recognized in natural science, form the only proper elements in any philosophical or other inquiry. The classic statement of scientism is the physicist E. Rutherford's saying 'there is physics and there is stamp-collecting.'", definition from The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. n.d.
  4. After reviewing the usage of the term by contemporary scholars, Gregory R Peterson concludes that "the best way to understand the charge of scientism is as a kind of logical fallacy involving improper usage of science or scientific claims." (p.753). From: "Peterson, Gregory R. (2003) Demarcation and the Scientistic Fallacy. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 38 (4), 751-761. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2003.00536.x"
  5. Scientism by Martin Ryder - University of Colorado. (Accessed: July 05 2007)
  6. Robert Bannister, "Behaviorism, Scientism and the Rise of The "Expert"
  7. Haack, Susan, (2003). Defending Science Within Reason: Between Scientism and Cynicism. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books
  8. Rey, Abel. "Review of La Philosophie Moderne." The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 6.2 (1909): 51-53.
  9. cf. Abraham Maslow: "There are criticisms of orthodox, 19th Century scientism and I intend to continue with this enterprise." Toward a Psychology of Being, Preface to 1st edition
  10. ^ "Peterson, Gregory R. (2003) Demarcation and the Scientistic Fallacy. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 38 (4), 751-761. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2003.00536.x"
  11. As described by Mikael Stenmark, author of the article about the topic of Scientism in: J. Wentzel Vrede van Huyssteen (editor). Encyclopedia of science and religion, 2nd ed. Thomson Gale. 2003. (p.783)
  12. G. Monastra, M. M. Zarandi, Science and the Myth of Progress, 2004.
  13. E. F. Schumacher, Guide for the Perplexed, ISBN 0060906111, p. 4
  14. Robinson, Marilynne (2006-11-01). "Hysterical Scientism: The Ecstasy of Richard Dawkins". Harper's Magazine. Text can be read here
  15. Byrnes, Sholto. "'When it comes to facts, and explanations of facts, science is the only game in town'" New Statesman 10 Apr. 2006.
  16. Shermer, Michael. "The Shamans of Scientism." Scientific American June 2002.
  17. C Tart, video lecture
  18. Random House Dictionary of the English Language. 1987.
  19. Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary. 1983. Cf. "Scientism" definition 1, Oxford English Dictionary web edition, accessed October 16, 2009
  20. Webster. 1983.
  21. Webster. 1983. Definition #3 for Scientism.
  22. Webster. 1983. Definition #2 for Scientism.
  23. "Scientism" definition 2, Oxford English Dictionary web edition, accessed October 16, 2009
  24. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition. 2000. Bartleby.com
  25. "Scientism" - PBS.org. Faith and Reason.
Philosophy of science
Concepts
Theories
Philosophy of...
Related topics
Philosophers of science
Precursors
  • Category
  • Philosophy portal
  • icon Science portal
    • Analytic philosophy
    Related articles
    Areas of focus
    Turns
    Logic
    Theories
    Concepts
    Modality
    Philosophers
    Australian realism
    Cambridge
    Oxford
    Logical positivists
    Berlin Circle
    Vienna Circle
    Harvard
    Notre Dame
    Pittsburgh School
    Pragmatism
    Princeton
    Quietism
    Reformed
    Science
    Stanford School
    Lwow-Warsaw
    Categories: