| Revision as of 23:12, 1 January 2010 view sourceGwen Gale (talk | contribs)47,788 edits indef blocked← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:43, 1 January 2010 view source Nishidani (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users99,555 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{indefblocked}} | {{indefblocked}} | ||
| This user was a very fine, upcoming editor of considerable promise, who, perhaps because of those qualities was mercilessly harassed, victimized, and driven to make one unguarded remark out of pure frustration, and fear that his block would inconvenience his fellow workers. He did little that could, in any human society, be considered troublesome. He did much to encourage disenchanted editors to renew their confidence in wikipedia as a project. Shameful, deeply shameful. For those who still read books, Melville's ] contains the moral.] (]) 23:43, 1 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:43, 1 January 2010
You are using this template in the wrong namespace. Use this template on a user talk page instead.
This user was a very fine, upcoming editor of considerable promise, who, perhaps because of those qualities was mercilessly harassed, victimized, and driven to make one unguarded remark out of pure frustration, and fear that his block would inconvenience his fellow workers. He did little that could, in any human society, be considered troublesome. He did much to encourage disenchanted editors to renew their confidence in wikipedia as a project. Shameful, deeply shameful. For those who still read books, Melville's Billy Budd contains the moral.Nishidani (talk) 23:43, 1 January 2010 (UTC)