Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/StevenMario: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:35, 19 January 2010 editTimotheus Canens (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators38,430 edits Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments: decline - duck← Previous edit Revision as of 03:48, 20 January 2010 edit undoMuZemike (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users71,094 edits Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments: Marking as closed. 68.223.0.0/18 blockedNext edit →
Line 37: Line 37:
:{{Decline}}. {{duck}}, no CU necessary. ] (]) 13:35, 19 January 2010 (UTC) :{{Decline}}. {{duck}}, no CU necessary. ] (]) 13:35, 19 January 2010 (UTC)



{{admin-note}} The only thing I could really do was block 68.223.0.0/18 for 1 week. Otherwise, the other IPs keep hopping all over the place in which rangeblocking (or regular blocking) wouldn't do much good (unless you like playing Whack-A-Mole). –] 03:48, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
{{SPIclose}}
---- ----

Revision as of 03:48, 20 January 2010

StevenMario

StevenMario (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/StevenMario/Archive.

Report date January 18 2010, 23:16 (UTC)


Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by MikeWazowski

StevenMario was blocked on January 7 for disruptive editing relating to edit warring and constantly inserting unreferenced information into articles. Before his block, a previous investigation found that he frequently edited without logging in, always from IPs in Georgia where (according to this edit) he lives. StevenMario appears to be continuing this pattern, as the IPs listed above (and others reported by another editor here) all appear (using the Geolocate link) to be coming from the same area and are editing the same articles with the same pattern that StevenMario followed. MikeWazowski (talk) 23:16, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties   

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Declined, the reason can be found below.    Requested by MikeWazowski (talk) 23:16, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm requesting CheckUser to determine for certain that StevenMario's edits came from a similar IP range, so that whatever necessary blocks are needed can be implemented to stop this troublesome editor. MikeWazowski (talk) 23:16, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

 Clerk declined.  Looks like a duck to me, no CU necessary. Tim Song (talk) 13:35, 19 January 2010 (UTC)


information Administrator note The only thing I could really do was block 68.223.0.0/18 for 1 week. Otherwise, the other IPs keep hopping all over the place in which rangeblocking (or regular blocking) wouldn't do much good (unless you like playing Whack-A-Mole). –MuZemike 03:48, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

This case has been marked as closed. It will be archived after its final review by a Clerk or Checkuser.

{{SPIclose}} is deprecated. Please change the parameter in the {{SPI case status}} to "close" instead.


Categories: